- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
Court case W256 2227693-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A company running a loyalty program was found to have processed personal data without proper consent. The court upheld the decision that the company failed to clearly inform users about how their data would be used. This case serves as a reminder for businesses to ensure transparency in their data practices.
What happened
The company unlawfully processed personal data from loyalty program participants without valid consent.
Who was affected
Participants in the loyalty program whose personal data was processed were affected.
What the authority found
The court upheld the decision that the company did not obtain valid consent and failed to provide clear information about data processing.
Why this matters
This case highlights the importance of clear communication and consent in data processing. Businesses should ensure they provide understandable information to users about how their data will be used.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The appellant is a company which ran a loyalty programme for which it collected and processed data subjects’ personal data. More precisely, it “combined and [analysed their] participation data and purchase data in order to send [them] individualised information on [the] programme that is relevant to me and tailored to my interests (…) in order to send [out] advertising with personalised offers about products and services of the operator and [its] partners.” It claimed this data would be deleted if individuals revoked their consent to such processing. The Austrian DPA, following an ex officio investigation into the company's data practices, found that it unlawfully processed the programme’s participants’ personal data because it failed to obtain their valid consent. In particular, the information on profiling was neither available in an easily accessible form nor formulated in clear and simple language, and could therefore not be used as a legal basis under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. It is noteworthy that the company "had at no time relied on legitimate interests within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR as a legal basis for processing for the purpose of profiling", and the DPA originally found that such a balancing of interests would in any case turn out against it. The company filed a first appeal against this decision. The DPA therefore had to issue a preliminary ruling on its original decision, which it ultimately upheld. The company then appealed this ruling to the Austrian Federal Administrative Court. (Please note: The Federal Administrative Court can only consider an appeal of this preliminary ruling). The appeal was deemed permissible because “[there was] no case law of the highest courts on the question of whether, in order to assess the lawfulness of data processing in the case of invalid consent pursuant to Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, it is permissible to have recourse to other permissible elements of Article 6 GDPR.” As such, this was the key issue in this case. I
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W256 2227693-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
31 August 2021
Authority
Datenschutzbehörde
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W256 2227693-1 - Austria (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: