- Enforcing jurisdiction
- United Kingdom · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
William Stadler – Court Ruling (United Kingdom, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A UK court ruled that William Stadler did not properly handle personal data stored on a broken Smart TV. The company resold the TV without wiping the data, which led to unauthorized purchases using the claimant's account. This case highlights the importance of properly managing personal data before disposing of devices.
What happened
William Stadler resold a broken Smart TV without wiping the personal data stored on it.
Who was affected
The claimant, a person who had stored personal data on the Smart TV, was affected.
What the authority found
The court found that the company failed to protect personal data, which could lead to misuse.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must ensure personal data is wiped before resale. It serves as a warning for businesses to implement better data protection practices.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The claimant is a data subject who purchased a Smart TV from the defendant, a consumer electronics chain. After a certain period of use, the device broke down. On the device, the claimant had stored personal data such as names, account details and payment data for several apps. The defendant requested the return of the device for repair but the claimant was not asked to delete and/or remove personal data before sending it in. Although faulty, the device had enough functionality to allow a user to log out from any apps. Notably, the claimant did not log out of their Amazon app before leaving the TV with the defendant. Later, the parties agreed that any repair of the device would be disproportionately costly and so the TV should be written-off. The claimant’s understanding was that the device would be destroyed. However, the defendant re-sold the unit without performing a factory reset or data wipe. Subsequently, someone used the claimant's Amazon account through the unit to make a small in-app purchase. The claimant became aware of the transaction and, following a complaint, the defendant refunded the cost incurred and provided a shopping voucher as a gesture of goodwill. The claimant argued that the defendant breached its data protection duties by disposing of the device without first wiping any data stored on it, and brought an action for damages in the High Court for misuse of private information, breach of confidence, negligence, and breach of data protection law under Article 82 UK-GDPR and sections 168 and 169 of the [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents/enacted Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018]. The defendant applied for the claim to be struck out under 3.4(2)(a) and (b) CPR or, alternatively, to grant summary judgement under 24.2 CPR since “it did not process the data and was not a data controller because it did not know about the data, had not been made aware of it, and reasonably believed it to be the responsibility of the claimant. Furtherm
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for William Stadler in UK
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
31 January 2022
Authority
DPA EWHC
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. William Stadler - United Kingdom (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: