- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Poland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case III OSK 4763/21 – Court Ruling (Poland, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Polish court ruled that a debt collection fund could legally process personal data related to a non-existent debt. This case is important because it shows how privacy rights can be limited when it comes to debt recovery.
What happened
A non-standardized securitization fund processed personal data to collect a debt that the individual claimed did not exist.
Who was affected
A person who disputed the existence of the debt and requested the removal of their personal data from the fund's database.
What the authority found
The Polish data protection authority found that the fund had a legal basis for processing the data, as it was part of debt recovery practices.
Why this matters
This case illustrates the balance between privacy rights and the legal obligations of debt recovery, reminding individuals of their rights when dealing with debt collectors.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The proceedings started with a complaint made to the Polish DPA (UODO) in which a data subject claimed that the processing of their personal data by a non-standardised securitisation fund (fund) was not justified and lacked legal basis on the grounds that the debt being collected by the fund was non-existent. The plaintiff therefore requested that all of their personal data be removed from the fund’s database in accordance with Article 17(1) GDPR. The personal data obtained by the fund included: name, surname, date of birth, gender, national identification number, correspondence addresses, telephone number, e-mail address, as well as information on the claim broken down to financial components, including principal amount, interest and bank account number dedicated to debt repayment, the date of the contract and the date of termination of the contract. The UODO decided that the processing of personal data by the fund was lawful, since the fund acquired the debt from an original creditor in the performance of a contract under Article 28 GDPR. The UODO stated that as a debtor, the data subject must consider that their right to privacy may be limited in connection with the recovery of debts. The UODO emphasized, however, that it had not examined the factual elements regarding the existence of the debt or its amount, which are issues that should be determined by civil courts. The claimant, which disputed the existence of the debt, specifically complained about receiving importunate telephone calls by the fund. With regards to these allegations, the UODO explained that this issue must be considered in the context of established practices applied by debt collection agencies. The UODO, therefore, decided that the fund was not obligated to grant the data subject's erasure request, since it had a legitimate interest and legal basis for processing the data. The data subject appealed this decision to the Voivodship Administrative Court in Warsaw, on the basis that the UODO inco
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case III OSK 4763/21 in PL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
13 January 2022
Authority
Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case III OSK 4763/21 - Poland (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: