Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

unknown teacher (claimant) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA OLGWien2 February 2022Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court ruled that a teacher's personal data was being processed unlawfully by an app that allowed students to rate teachers. The court decided that the app did not have proper safeguards to prevent unauthorized ratings. This ruling is important as it emphasizes the need for companies to ensure that personal data is handled with care and consent.

What happened

The court found that an app allowed students to rate a teacher without proper safeguards or consent.

Who was affected

The teacher whose name and school were visible in the app and who was rated by users.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the app's processing of the teacher's personal data was unlawful due to a lack of safeguards and consent.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of protecting individuals' personal data in online platforms. Companies creating similar apps must ensure they have the necessary measures in place to protect users' privacy.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 79 GDPR
Art. 85 GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 79(GDPR)
Art. 85(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 1330 Austrian Civil Code (Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch - ABGB)
§ 16 Austrian Civil Code (Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch - ABGB)
Decision AuthorityOGH
Reviewed AuthorityOLG Wien (Austria)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In 2019, the first defendant (the "developer") developed an app for students to rate school teachers (the "app"). In December 2019 the developer founded the second defendant (the "platform"), a limited liability company, and offered the app for download using the platform. In early 2020, the Austrian Data Protection Authority conducted an ex officio investigation into the platform's data protection conduct. This investigation was later ceased without a formal decision. The claimant was a school teacher whose name and school could be seen in the app, making him subject to ratings by users of the app. They argued that the data processing on the app violated their rights to data protection. They never consented to be subject to ratings on the app and argued that there was also no other legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR that the app could rely on to make the data processing lawful. They further argued that the app didn't provide sufficient safeguards to prevent people other than their students to rate them. In their lawsuit, the teacher demanded the first instance court, Landesgericht Wien (LG Wien), to disallow the possible future processing of his personal data by the defendants and to order the defendants to erase the data relating to the teacher under Article 17 GDPR. The LG Wien dismissed the lawsuit, holding in essence that the legitimate interests to provide ratings on the teacher outweighed their interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Hence the court considered the processing to be lawful. The teacher filed an appeal. The second instance court, Oberlandesgericht Wien (OLG Wien), upheld the lawsuit and ordered the developer and the platform to stop the processing until it was ensured that only actual students of the teacher could rate them. It argued that, as the app offered no safeguards against unjustified ratings by random strangers, the teacher's interest under Article 6(1)(f) overrode that of the developer and the platform and the data were to be deleted un

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for unknown teacher (claimant) in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

2 February 2022

Authority

DPA OLGWien

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. unknown teacher (claimant) - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: