Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case 9435922 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA RbRotterdam25 February 2022Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch company faced legal action after it mistakenly emailed an unencrypted file containing personal data of 1,100 potential home buyers. The court found that the company unlawfully processed personal data by sending this sensitive information without proper security. This case serves as a reminder for businesses to handle personal data carefully to avoid breaches.

What happened

The company unlawfully sent an unencrypted email containing personal data of potential home buyers.

Who was affected

1,100 individuals who registered to buy homes were affected by the data breach.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the company had no legal basis for processing the personal data when it sent the email.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of data security and legal compliance in handling personal information. Companies must ensure they have proper safeguards in place to protect sensitive data.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 82 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 82(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityRb. Rotterdam

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is a company that is contracted to plan and build a new neighborhood (called the “Koningskwartier”) in the village Zevenhuizen. In 2021, people that were interested to potentially purchase a house in this neighborhood, could register on the website of the company. Approximately 1,100 persons, including the data subject, made use of this possibility. During the registration, various confidential personal data of these persons were collected, such as the first- and last name; place- and date of birth; email address; phone number; maximum amount they could borrow for the mortgage; yearly income etc. On 12 April 2021, the controller sent out an email to all persons that registered and attached an unencrypted excel file to this email, that contained all the personal data listed above. The data subject then replied to the email and notified the controller of the fact that they wanted to be reimbursed for the damages of the data breach. The controller tried to repair their mistake by sending out an email to all recipients regarding the mistake. However, they refused to comply with the data subject’s request, so the data subject brought the matter before court. The data subject requested the court to order the controller to pay him € 750 in material damages to purchase a new phone since he was being harassed by an unknown number via WhatsApp. Moreover, he wanted € 20,000 in immaterial damages because he feels “watched” and he lost his trust in other people. The controller explained this data breach was caused due to a human error and requested the Court to reject the data subject’s claim. First, the Court considered that the controller had no legal basis in Article 6 GDPR to send out an email that contained data subject’s personal data, and thus unlawfully processed the data subject’s personal data. Moreover, the Court noted that it follows from Recital 146 GDPR that the notion of “damage” must be interpreted broadly, and found that data subject’s damages

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 9435922 in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

25 February 2022

Authority

DPA RbRotterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 9435922 - Netherlands (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: