Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case Ra 2020/04/0187 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA VwGH24 February 2022Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruling in Austria found that a data authority's fine against a company for selling personal data was unlawful. The court stated that the authority failed to properly attribute the actions to specific individuals responsible for the violations. This ruling is significant as it clarifies the need for accountability in data protection cases.

What happened

The Austrian court annulled a fine against a data publisher for not properly attributing violations to responsible individuals.

Who was affected

The company involved in the sale of personal data and the individuals responsible for the alleged violations.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the data authority's fine was unlawful due to a lack of proper attribution of responsibility.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how data protection authorities must document and attribute violations. Companies should be aware that accountability is crucial in data protection enforcement.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 83 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 83(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityVwGH

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is an address publisher and direct advertising company that operates a data application in order to provide advertisers with personal data for targeted marketing measures. In 2019, the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) initiated an ex officio investigation against the controller, following media reports about the alleged sale of personal data, in particular information about the political affinity of individual persons. Based on the findings, the DSB issued a fine of €18,000,000. The natural persons responsible for the infringements belonged to the economic unit formed by the controller as a legal person. Therefore the infringement was attributed to the controller. The controller appealed to the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG), arguing that it was not sufficient for a legal person to have committed a criminal offence for a fine to be imposed on it under the GDPR. As a legal person that cannot act on its own, the actions of a natural person must also be attributed to it but the DSB had omitted this attribution. The BVwG agreed with the controller's reasoning. Since the DSB had not named the natural person whose breach of the GDPR was to be attributed to the controller, the DSB's decision proved to be unlawful. The DSB filed an extraordinary official appeal against this decision with the Austrian Supreme Administrative Court (VwGH). It referred to the pending case of the Higher Regional Court of Berlin (KG Berlin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-807/21) where the question at issue - as in the case at hand - is whether the supervisory authority must record and name those natural persons who are responsible for the infringement in order to enable attribution to the legal person, or whether this is not necessary. The DSB therefore requested to refer the question of the direct criminal liability of a legal person under Article 83 GDPR and the question of the compatibility of § 30 Datenschutzgesetz (Austrian Data

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case Ra 2020/04/0187 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

24 February 2022

Authority

DPA VwGH

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case Ra 2020/04/0187 - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: