Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

State Secretary of Justice and Security – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA RbMidden-Nederland26 April 2021Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court upheld a decision that a person's request to access their personal data was rejected because it was too vague. This is significant because it shows that requests for personal data must be specific. It reminds individuals to clearly state what information they want.

What happened

The court upheld the rejection of a person's request to access their personal data due to lack of specificity.

Who was affected

A person who sought access to their personal data related to a court procedure.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the request was unfounded as it did not specify the personal data being sought.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of clearly articulating data access requests, which can help individuals better navigate their rights under data protection laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityRb. Midden-Nederland

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 9 July 2019, the data subject made a request to the Ministry of Justice and Security (the controller) to access his personal data pursuant to Article 15 GDPR. The controller decided to reject this request on 15 October 2019. During the hearing on 26 November 2019, the controller deemed the data subject's request to be formulated too generally. In response to this, the data subject specified it by requesting access to the personal data processed during the exchange of documents by the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service with the civil registry of the municipality and the Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden. The data subject specifically wanted to know which personal data had been processed in connection with the procedure before the Court of Appeal concerning an alleged sham paternity recognition of his daughter, and by which departments these data had been processed. In the contested decision from 19 December 2019, the controller considered the data subject’s objection to the decision as unfounded since his request did not concern personal data that had been processed by the Repatriation and Departure Service. Moreover, the data subject had initially failed to respond sufficiently to the request of the controller to provide additional information regarding his request to access. Consequently, there is no right to penalty payment due to the failing of a timely decision as the controller had the right to reject the data subject's application as unfounded. The data subject appealed this decision. First, the data subject was interested in the detailed documents and appendices in which his personal data had been processed. In the District Court’s opinion, the data subject had no right to this under Article 15 GDPR. This Article does not provide the right to physical or digital copies in which the personal data has been processed. This is further specified in Article 15(3) GDPR as it states that the data subject has the right to a copy of the personal da

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for State Secretary of Justice and Security in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

26 April 2021

Authority

DPA RbMidden-Nederland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. State Secretary of Justice and Security - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: