- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 4 U 1905/21 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A German court ruled that a private health insurance company could deny a customer's request for information about premium increases. The court decided that the request was excessive since it aimed only to verify premium validity, not the legality of data processing. This ruling clarifies the limits of the right to access personal data.
What happened
A customer sued a health insurance company for information on premium increases, but the court ruled the request was excessive.
Who was affected
A customer of the private health insurance company who sought information on their premium adjustments.
What the authority found
The Higher Regional Court of Dresden ruled that the customer's request for information about premium increases was excessive under GDPR.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent on how requests for data access can be limited. It reminds customers and companies alike that not all inquiries about personal data are valid under GDPR.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The controller is a private health insurance company. The data subject is a customer of the controller. The parties are in dispute about the validity of several increases to the insurance premiums. The data subject filed a lawsuit with the Regional Court of Leipzig (Landgericht Leipzig - LG Leipzig) requesting the refund of overpaid premiums as well as information on all adjustments to the premiums in the form of notification letters sent to the data subject and supplements to the insurance policy. The controller rejected both claims. The Regional Court of Leipzig dismissed the data subject's claim almost entirely. As a consequence, the data subject appealed this decision to the Higher Regional Court of Dresden (Oberlandesgericht Dresden - OLG Dresden). The Higher Regional Court of Dresden dismissed the plaintiffs appeal. The court found that the right to access cannot be used to obtain information about premium increases. For its reasoning the court exclusively quoted a decision of the Higher Regional Court of Hamm (Oberlandesgericht Hamm - OLG Hamm) from the 15th November 2021 (case nr. 20 U 269/21). In the quoted decision, the OLG Hamm held that a controller is allowed to reject a request to access under Article 12(5)(b) GDPR as "excessive" if the request's sole purpose is to verify the validity of premium increases instead of verifying the lawfulness of the processing of personal data. In its reasoning the OLG Hamm found that the term "in particular" in Article 12(5)(b) GDPR shows that there can also be other circumstances than the repetitiveness of a request which can render a request "excessive". The court further referred to Recital 63 and established that the purpose of the right to access is to be aware of, and verify, the lawfulness of the processing of personal data. Therefore, the Court considered a request whose sole purpose is to verify the validity of premium increases instead of verifying the lawfulness of the processing of personal data excessive
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 4 U 1905/21 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
15 March 2022
Authority
DPA LGLeipzig
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 4 U 1905/21 - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: