Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.

Unknown customer – Court Ruling (Germany, 2018)

Court Ruling
DPA LGKoblenz22 May 2018Germany
final
Court Ruling

Court ruling predating the GDPR

This national court ruling predates the GDPR. Consult the recorded legal bases and decision for its applicable law. It is excluded from cookie statistics and the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled on a dispute over a mobile phone contract and data processing. The case involved a person who claimed they had the right to withdraw from a contract, which affected their credit history. This ruling highlights the importance of clear contract terms and data handling.

What happened

The court addressed a dispute regarding a person's right to withdraw from a mobile phone contract and the subsequent data processing issues.

Who was affected

The individual who entered into the mobile phone contract and was affected by the data processing related to unpaid invoices.

What the authority found

The court examined the validity of the contract and the implications of data processing on the individual's credit history.

Why this matters

This case underscores the need for clear communication in contract terms and responsible data handling by companies. Businesses should ensure they understand the implications of their contracts on customer data.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 82 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 82(GDPR)
Art. 6(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 287(1) ZPO
Decision AuthorityOLG Koblenz
Reviewed AuthorityLG Koblenz

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject concluded a mobile phone contract with the controller on 25 September 2018. The contract gave the data subject the option to change her payment plan in the fourth to the sixth month of the contract in exchange for a contractual extension of another 24 months, which the defendant took on 27 December 2018. On the same day she received an affirmative response from the controller which stated that her "present payment plan will be cancelled on 27 December 2020". On 6 January 2019, the data subject sent the controller a letter stating that she is exercising her right to withdraw from the contract within 14 days after the contract ([https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32011L0083 Article 9 Consumer Rights Directive]). From 11 February 2019 until 10 July 2019 the controller invoiced her several times. The data subject did not pay these invoices. On 16 September 2019 the controller arranged an out-of-court SCHUFA entry against the data subject. On 27 September 2019, the controller commissioned the deletion of the entry by the SCHUFA. However, only after instructing the SCHUFA a second time to delete the entry, the entry was finally marked as to be deleted on 19.07.2021. As a result of the entry, the data subject was denied a loan on the 26 March 2020 and on 29 December 2020 a loan was only granted on the condition that the entry is erased. Because of the oustanding invoices, the controller initiated court proceedings against the data subject arguing that the data subject was bound by the contract and did not have a right to withdraw from the contract, because the change of the payment plan was a mere alteration of the original contract and not a new replacing contract. The data subject, on the other hand, argued that it was indeed a new contract which replaced the old one so she had a fourteen day period to withdraw from the contract under the respective German provision of [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:3201

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Unknown customer in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

22 May 2018

Authority

DPA LGKoblenz

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Unknown customer - Germany (2018). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: