Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Pflegeplatzmanager GmbHhttps://gruendelpartner.de/newsroom/gruendelpartner-erwirkt-weitreichende-entscheidung-zur-unzulaessigkeit-von-cloud-und-it-dienstleistungen-durch-us-tochterunternehmen-in-deutschland/ – Court Ruling (Germany, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA VKBaden-Wrttemberg13 July 2022Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Germany ruled on a procurement dispute involving Pflegeplatzmanager GmbH, which challenged a contract award for software. The decision is significant because it addresses data protection requirements in public contracts. Companies bidding for public contracts must meet strict data security standards.

What happened

The court reviewed a procurement decision where Pflegeplatzmanager GmbH contested the awarding of a software contract.

Who was affected

Pflegeplatzmanager GmbH and other companies involved in the procurement process.

What the authority found

The court's ruling clarified the requirements for data protection in public procurement procedures.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how data protection is handled in public contracts, reminding companies that they must comply with data security standards when bidding.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 44 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 44(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 57(1)(4) VgV
Decision AuthorityVK Baden-Württemberg

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The case concerned a decision by Vergabekammer Baden-Württemberg (Procurement Chamber Baden-Württemberg), the administrative authority that reviews public procurement procedures. A publicly owned company (Regionale Kliniken Holding RKH GmbH, today RKH Regionale Kliniken Holding und Services GmbH), owned only by municipalities and regional authorities and therefore subject to public procurement law, invited tenders for the procurement of software for digital administration in an open procedure throughout Europe.https://ausschreibungen-deutschland.de/843547_Software_fuer_Digitales_EntlassmanagementReferenznummer_der_Bekanntmachung_2021-20-WEI-OV_2021_Ludwigsburg The criteria contained, among other things, requirements for data protection and IT security. The company inviting the tenders received offers from company A and company B (Pflegeplatzmanager GmbH)https://gruendelpartner.de/newsroom/gruendelpartner-erwirkt-weitreichende-entscheidung-zur-unzulaessigkeit-von-cloud-und-it-dienstleistungen-durch-us-tochterunternehmen-in-deutschland/. Company A used the services of company C (Amazon Web Services EMEA S.à r.l.)The decision was pulished via [http://web.archive.org/web/20220812064735/https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/ocw-13-07-2022-1-vk-2322/ rewis.io]. The used clauses are unique to [https://d1.awsstatic.com/legal/aws-gdpr/AWS_GDPR_DPA.pdf AWS]. a subsidiary of company D (Amazon Web Services, Inc.) based in the United States, as a sub-processor. Its servers were located in the EU. Company C included clauses in its offer stating that it would not disclose customer data to any third party, except as necessary to maintain or provide the services, or as necessary to comply with the law or a valid and binding order of a governmental body. After reviewing the offers, the publicly owned company issued a decision where it awarded the contract to Company A, as their evaluation of the price was the most economical. Company B challenged this decision. It argued that company A had

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Pflegeplatzmanager GmbHhttps://gruendelpartner.de/newsroom/gruendelpartner-erwirkt-weitreichende-entscheidung-zur-unzulaessigkeit-von-cloud-und-it-dienstleistungen-durch-us-tochterunternehmen-in-deutschland/ in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 July 2022

Authority

DPA VKBaden-Wrttemberg

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Pflegeplatzmanager GmbHhttps://gruendelpartner.de/newsroom/gruendelpartner-erwirkt-weitreichende-entscheidung-zur-unzulaessigkeit-von-cloud-und-it-dienstleistungen-durch-us-tochterunternehmen-in-deutschland/ - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: