Court case W101 2218962-2 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2023)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde16 January 2023Austria
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court found that a wife's expert unlawfully used her husband's personal data during divorce proceedings. This decision emphasizes that even in personal disputes, data must be handled lawfully.

What happened

The court found that the wife's expert unlawfully processed the husband's personal data during divorce proceedings.

Who was affected

The affected person was the husband whose personal data was used without proper legal basis.

What the authority found

The court decided that the expert unlawfully processed the husband's data, violating GDPR requirements for lawful processing.

Why this matters

This case underscores the importance of lawful data processing, even in personal matters like divorce. It serves as a reminder that personal data must be handled with care and in compliance with legal standards.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 4 GDPR
Art. 6 GDPR

National Law Articles

Austrian Constitution
Decision AuthorityBVwG
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

This case originally concerned a complaint filed by a (soon-to-be-ex) husband, the data subject, against his (soon-to-be-ex) wife. During divorce proceedings the wife had commissioned an expert to calculate the amount of maintenance she would be due. This was determined on the basis of the data subject’s personal information – including income, property value, and the economic figures of a private foundation of which both parties were beneficiaries – which the claim alleges had been obtained unlawfully. For clarification, it is important to note from the outset that, in this case, the controller is the expert who was commissioned by the wife, and the wife is a third party within the meaning of Article 4(10) GDPR. Initially the complaint was filed with the DPA, which stated that it could not be established how the wife had obtained the relevant data. Furthermore, the authority found that while in principle the information was personal data worthy of protection, the existence of overriding legitimate interests on the part of the complainant’s wife made the processing lawful (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). It was also pointed out that the wife, as a beneficiary of the private foundation, had a right to information in accordance with § 30(1) of the Austrian Private Foundation Act. This decision was appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, the data subject argued that an economic interest in accessing the information – whether it be the wife’s legitimate interest or the expert’s interest in fulfilling a contract – should never outweigh his constitutionally protected fundamental right to data protection. Also, according to the established case law of the civil courts, a private expert opinion is merely a private document which exclusively reflects the opinion of its author and is not suitable evidence in divorce proceedings. The Federal Administrative Court upheld the appeal and found that the controller, as the responsible party, had unlawfully processed the data in violati

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W101 2218962-2 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

16 January 2023

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W101 2218962-2 - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: