Court case W101 2218962-2 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2023)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court found that a wife's expert unlawfully used her husband's personal data during divorce proceedings. This decision emphasizes that even in personal disputes, data must be handled lawfully.
What happened
The court found that the wife's expert unlawfully processed the husband's personal data during divorce proceedings.
Who was affected
The affected person was the husband whose personal data was used without proper legal basis.
What the authority found
The court decided that the expert unlawfully processed the husband's data, violating GDPR requirements for lawful processing.
Why this matters
This case underscores the importance of lawful data processing, even in personal matters like divorce. It serves as a reminder that personal data must be handled with care and in compliance with legal standards.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
This case originally concerned a complaint filed by a (soon-to-be-ex) husband, the data subject, against his (soon-to-be-ex) wife. During divorce proceedings the wife had commissioned an expert to calculate the amount of maintenance she would be due. This was determined on the basis of the data subject’s personal information – including income, property value, and the economic figures of a private foundation of which both parties were beneficiaries – which the claim alleges had been obtained unlawfully. For clarification, it is important to note from the outset that, in this case, the controller is the expert who was commissioned by the wife, and the wife is a third party within the meaning of Article 4(10) GDPR. Initially the complaint was filed with the DPA, which stated that it could not be established how the wife had obtained the relevant data. Furthermore, the authority found that while in principle the information was personal data worthy of protection, the existence of overriding legitimate interests on the part of the complainant’s wife made the processing lawful (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). It was also pointed out that the wife, as a beneficiary of the private foundation, had a right to information in accordance with § 30(1) of the Austrian Private Foundation Act. This decision was appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, the data subject argued that an economic interest in accessing the information – whether it be the wife’s legitimate interest or the expert’s interest in fulfilling a contract – should never outweigh his constitutionally protected fundamental right to data protection. Also, according to the established case law of the civil courts, a private expert opinion is merely a private document which exclusively reflects the opinion of its author and is not suitable evidence in divorce proceedings. The Federal Administrative Court upheld the appeal and found that the controller, as the responsible party, had unlawfully processed the data in violati
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W101 2218962-2 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W101 2218962-2 - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: