Enforcing jurisdiction
Poland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case III OSK 25287/21 – Court Ruling (Poland, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA WSAWarsaw16 November 2022Poland
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled on a case involving access to public documents, stating that a request for information must respect privacy rights. The court decided that personal identification numbers of judges should remain confidential. This case underlines the balance between public access to information and protecting individual privacy.

What happened

The Supreme Administrative Court ruled on whether personal identification numbers of judges should be disclosed in a public information request.

Who was affected

Judges whose personal identification numbers were requested in a public document access case.

What the authority found

The court held that the judges' personal identification numbers should not be disclosed as they are not related to their public functions.

Why this matters

This decision reinforces the need to protect personal information even in public records. It serves as a reminder for organizations to consider privacy when handling public information requests.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 86 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 86(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 149 § 1a p.p.s.a
Article 3 § 2(8) p.p.s.a
Article 70 of the Act on the Protection of Personal Data
Decision AuthorityNSA
Reviewed AuthorityWSA Warsaw (Poland)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 25 January 2018, the plaintiff filed a request with the Parliament (the defendant) to access the list of candidates for the National Council of the Judiciary. The documents requested contained a list of citizens supporting a given application and/or lists of judges supporting a given application. By decision of 27 February 2018, the defendant refused to comply with the request. The plaintiff appealed this decision to the Court of First Instance. The Court of First Instance ordered the defendant to comply with the request to access document, but only after having anonymised the judges' personal identification number (PIN). The Court held that the PIN was not related to the public function performed by the judges, and therefore should not be made available. During the Court of First Instance proceedings, the Polish DPA initiated ex officio proceedings concerning the same matter and ordered the defendant (the controller) to restrict any further processing of personal data, including refraining from making them publicy available in any form. After not having received any information several months after the decision of the Court of First Instance, the plaintiff started proceedings regarding inaction by the defendant. As a result, the Court of Second Instance ordered the defendant again to comply with the request. The defendant filed a cassation appeal before the Supreme Administrative Court. The main argument of the defendant was the DPA decision, which contrary to the Court of First Instance order, prohibited the defendant from disclosing the information. In the cassation appeal, the Court considered whether the information ought to be disclosed and whether a DPA decision to not comply with a public information access request could overturn a court judgement on the same matter. The Supreme Administrative Court ruled that the Court of First Instance exercised the constitutional right to control the activity of public administration and ruled legally that the

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case III OSK 25287/21 in PL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

16 November 2022

Authority

DPA WSAWarsaw

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case III OSK 25287/21 - Poland (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: