- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Norway · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case PVN-2022-14 – Court Ruling (Norway, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Norwegian company was found to have illegally accessed a former employee's email after she objected to the processing of her data. This ruling is significant because it reinforces the rights of individuals to control their personal data. The company was ordered to improve its data handling practices.
What happened
The company forwarded a former employee's emails without a valid legal basis after she objected to the processing.
Who was affected
The former employee whose emails were accessed without her consent.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that the company violated GDPR by not having a valid reason for processing the employee's emails.
Why this matters
This case serves as a warning to companies about the importance of respecting individuals' rights regarding their personal data, especially when they object to its processing.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A company (the controller) inspected the e-mail inbox and automatically forwarded an e-mail of its former employee (the data subject) after she had objected to processing of her personal data under Article 21 GDPR. The data subject filed a complaint with the Norwegian DPA, claiming that there was no legal basis for accessing and processing her e-mails in such a form. The DPA initiated proceedings and asked the controller for explanation. After not receiving any information past the deadline, it rendered a decision. The DPA held that automatic forwarding of the contents of the data subject's e-mail box could not be based on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR nor any other valid legal basis. The controller did not comply with its duty to carry out a balancing of interests after the data subject had objected to the processing, under Article 21 GDPR. Finally, the DPA held that the controller did not comply with its duty to inform the data subject of the forwarding of her e-mails, violating Article 13 GDPR. The DPA concluded that the infringements were intentional and serious. Hence, the DPA imposed a NOK 100,000 fine on the controller. It also ordered the controller improve internal control and routines for access to employees' and former employees' e-mail boxes. The controller appealed this decision to the Norwegian Privacy Appeals Board (Privacy Board). First, the Privacy Board considered whether the DPA had been correct in imposing a fine on the controller. It recalled that Article 83(1) GDPR obliges DPAs to ensure that the imposed fines are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In this regard, the Privacy Board held that illegal forwarding of e-mails is a violation of the basic principles of lawfulness and transparency (Article 5(1)(a) GDPR). When basic rules for the protection of employees' privacy are disregarded as in this case, the violations must be regarded as serious. Therefore, the DPA was correct to impose a fine on the controller. Second, the Privacy Board conside
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case PVN-2022-14 in NO
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
13 December 2022
Authority
Datatilsynet (Norway)
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case PVN-2022-14 - Norway (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: