Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.
Privacy topics

Court case 10 E 1898/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA VGWiesbaden1 December 2022Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Superior Administrative Court Kassel ruled that a case regarding data requests should be referred to a local court. This decision clarifies the proper jurisdiction for handling such cases, which is important for ensuring that privacy rights are respected.

What happened

The court determined that the local court of Oranienburg is the appropriate venue for the case.

Who was affected

The plaintiff seeking to have their data request addressed legally.

What the authority found

The court held that the local court should handle the case because the data authority was not acting in a sovereign capacity.

Why this matters

This ruling clarifies jurisdictional issues related to data privacy cases, ensuring that individuals know where to seek legal recourse for their privacy concerns.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 7(1) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 7(1) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 17a Abs. 4 Satz 3 GVG
§ 44 Abs.1 S2 BDSG
Decision AuthorityVGH Kassel
Reviewed AuthorityVG Wiesbaden (Germany)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff request the responsive legal Court is the local Court where the plaintiff lives. The Superior Administrative Court Kassel say the plaintiff get the right ti referred this case to local court of Oranienburg. the local proper court of Oranienburg is responsive to decide this case because the statistic authority do not act in the exercise of sovereign powers himself if the data are internal operated or the request the data by a technical operating by webservers. the operation of webserver is not in the exercise of sovereign powers.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 10 E 1898/22 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

1 December 2022

Authority

DPA VGWiesbaden

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 10 E 1898/22 - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: