Court case UPRS I U 1911/2019-21 – Court Ruling (Slovenia, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Slovenian court addressed a procedural issue in a case where a man claimed his personal data was mishandled by a government authority. The court determined that the man should have first appealed to the Information Commissioner before escalating the issue. This highlights the need for individuals to follow correct legal procedures in data-related disputes.
What happened
A man alleged that a government authority mishandled his personal data without his knowledge or consent.
Who was affected
The individual who believed his personal data was mishandled by a government authority.
What the authority found
The court found that the man needed to appeal to the Information Commissioner before pursuing an administrative dispute.
Why this matters
This case emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in data protection cases. Individuals should understand the correct appeal processes to ensure their complaints are addressed properly.
National Law Articles
Plaintiff believed that the first instance authority had ilegally obtained, stored and processed his personal data related to registration of permanent residence without his consent or knowledge, he also claimed material and non-material damages because of this breach and not filling obligation in conection to data minimisation principle. Plaintiff requested deletion of his personal data. First instance authority made a decision, he appealed and second instance (Ministry of Agriculture,Forestry and Food). Administrative court has decided that plaintiff should have first appeald to Information Commissioner (Informacijski pooblaščenec) and then after that plaintiff would be allowed to start administrative dispute before Ministry. Since main issues were procedural nature, court did not go into judging matters of processing personal data. Given the content of the plaintiff's request, the defendant did not act correctly when it transferred his complaint for consideration to an authority which, according to the clear provisions of ZVOP-1, is not a competent authority for decision-making at the second level. Incorrect legal instruction on the right to appeal and wrongful conduct of the first-instance authority cannot be to the detriment of the party who acts on it.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case UPRS I U 1911/2019-21 in SI
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case UPRS I U 1911/2019-21 - Slovenia (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: