- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Slovenia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
Court case UPRS I U 1911/2019-21 – Court Ruling (Slovenia, 2022)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court ruled on a case where a person claimed their personal data was processed without consent regarding their permanent residence registration. The court decided that the complaint should have been directed to the Information Commissioner first. This ruling highlights the importance of following proper procedures in data protection cases.
What happened
The court addressed a complaint about the improper processing of personal data related to permanent residence registration.
Who was affected
A person who believed their personal data was unlawfully processed by the authorities.
What the authority found
The court found that the plaintiff should have appealed to the Information Commissioner before pursuing further legal action.
Why this matters
This ruling underscores the necessity of following correct procedures in data protection disputes. It serves as a reminder for individuals to understand the proper channels for addressing data privacy concerns.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
Plaintiff believed that the first instance authority had ilegally obtained, stored and processed his personal data related to registration of permanent residence without his consent or knowledge, he also claimed material and non-material damages because of this breach and not filling obligation in conection to data minimisation principle. Plaintiff requested deletion of his personal data. First instance authority made a decision, he appealed and second instance (Ministry of Agriculture,Forestry and Food). Administrative court has decided that plaintiff should have first appeald to Information Commissioner (Informacijski pooblaščenec) and then after that plaintiff would be allowed to start administrative dispute before Ministry. Since main issues were procedural nature, court did not go into judging matters of processing personal data. Given the content of the plaintiff's request, the defendant did not act correctly when it transferred his complaint for consideration to an authority which, according to the clear provisions of ZVOP-1, is not a competent authority for decision-making at the second level. Incorrect legal instruction on the right to appeal and wrongful conduct of the first-instance authority cannot be to the detriment of the party who acts on it.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case UPRS I U 1911/2019-21 in SI
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case UPRS I U 1911/2019-21 - Slovenia (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: