- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case W292 2248134-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2023)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court dismissed a complaint from a person who sent multiple access requests to various companies. The court ruled that the requests were excessive and burdened the supervisory authority.
What happened
A data subject's access request to multiple controllers was deemed excessive by the Austrian court.
Who was affected
A person who filed access requests with 16 different companies across multiple countries.
What the authority found
The court upheld the supervisory authority's decision to dismiss the complaint based on the excessive nature of the requests.
Why this matters
This case illustrates that individuals should be mindful of the number and nature of their requests to avoid overwhelming data protection authorities. It sets a standard for what constitutes an excessive request.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.
No issues were reported by that automated check.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A data subject sent an access request to 16 different controllers in multiple countries pursuant to Article 15 GDPR. Deeming the reply of these controllers not sufficient, the data subject lodged several complaints with the Austrian DPA. In the context of one of these complaints, the supervisory authority held that the request was excessive and dismissed it pursuant to Article 57(4) GDPR. The data subject appealed the decision before the Austrian federal administrative court supported by the non-profit noyb. The data subject lodged a complaint with the Austrian DPA for an alleged violation of Article 15 GDPR by one of the controllers. The DPA dismissed the claim on the basis of Article 57(4) GDPR. According to such provision, a DPA may charge a reasonable fee or refuse to act when a data subject’s request is either manifestly unfounded or excessive. Article 57(4) GDPR specifically mentions the case of repetitive claims. The federal administrative court pointed out to the fact that 16 almost identical complaints by the same data subject and in a time span of 7 months was a considerable amount of work for the supervisory authority. Another relevant point in assessing whether the claim was excessive was the fact that several controllers were based outside Austria and sometimes outside the EU. Due to the cooperation mechanisms envisaged by Articles 56 and following GDPR, the Austrian DPA would be forced to invest a large amount of resources in dealing with the data subject’s request. Concerning the controllers that were not based in the EU, the DPA was instead fully dependent on the availability to cooperate of other (when existent) supervisory authorities. The fact that in some cases only one day elapsed between the month envisaged by Article 12(3) GDPR as a deadline for the controller’s reply and the complaints was also an element suggesting that the request was excessive. In light of the above, the federal administrative court endorsed the supervisory authority
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W292 2248134-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
27 February 2023
Authority
Datenschutzbehörde
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W292 2248134-1 - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: