Enforcing jurisdiction
Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.

Court case KHO:2023:56 – Court Ruling (Finland, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA Pohjois-Suomenhallin5 June 2023Finland
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court ruled on a case involving a rental company that collected personal data from children. The court found that the company had a legitimate interest in processing this data for its rental activities. This ruling raises questions about the balance between business needs and children's privacy.

What happened

A rental company collected personal identity numbers of minor children without a clear legal basis.

Who was affected

Minor children living in or applying for accommodation in rented properties.

What the authority found

The court held that the rental company had a legitimate interest in processing the children's data, but the DPA argued this violated the principle of data minimization.

Why this matters

This case illustrates the complexities of processing children's data and the need for companies to carefully assess their legal bases for data collection. It emphasizes the importance of minimizing data collection to what is necessary.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 25 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 87 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 87(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 29 Data Protection Act
Decision AuthorityKorkein hallinto-oikeus
Reviewed AuthorityPohjois-Suomen hallinto-oikeus (Finland)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The rental company A Oy (the controller) regularly collected the personal identity numbers of minor children of families living in or applying for accommodation in rented accommodation. The Finnish DPA had ordered the controller to bring the processing operations regarding collection of the children's personal data into compliance with the GDPR, and to delete the collected personal identity numbers of minor children to the extent that there was no appropriate legal basis for their collection. In its decision, the DPA found that it was not necessary for the controller to, as a rule, collect the children’s personal data in light of the data minimisation principle stipulated in Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. The controller appealed the decision with the Administrative Court of Northern Finland which annulled the DPA’s decision. The Administrative Court viewed, inter alia, that the controller had a legitimate interest pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR for processing personal data of children for the purpose of its rental activities. Thereafter, the DPA challenged the court’s decision and appealed it with the Supreme Administrative Court in Finland. The DPA argued that the previous Court was incorrect to conclude that the processing in question was lawful because the controller had a legal basis under Article 6 GDPR. The DPA established that notwithstanding that the controller has a legal basis for processing, processing is still in breach of the GDPR when personal personal data are unnecessary for the specific purpose. In the view of the DPA, the court had failed to apply the principle of minimisation. The Supreme Administrative Court noted that the initial decision of the DPA did not address Article 6 GDPR. Therefore, the Supreme Administrative Court did not address the question of whether the controller had a legal basis within the meaning of Article 6 GDPR. The Supreme Administrative court focused on whether the controller’s collection of personal data of the children comp

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case KHO:2023:56 in FI

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

5 June 2023

Authority

DPA Pohjois-Suomenhallin

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case KHO:2023:56 - Finland (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: