Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 13 O 126/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA LGBonn7 June 2023Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that a Facebook user's phone number could be used by others to find their profile, leading to a major data breach affecting 533 million people. The user claimed damages after receiving phishing attempts, but the court found no direct link to the breach. This case highlights the risks of inadequate data protection measures.

What happened

A Facebook user's phone number was linked to their profile, allowing third parties to access their information.

Who was affected

The user was a Facebook member whose phone number was exposed to potential misuse.

What the authority found

The court decided that the company failed to ensure data integrity and confidentiality, violating GDPR requirements.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for companies to adopt strong security measures to protect personal data. It serves as a warning that failure to do so can lead to significant risks for users.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 82 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 82(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityLG Bonn

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, amount discrepancy, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was a Facebook user. According to the privacy settings selected at the moment of the facts, their phone number could be used by a third person to find the data subject’s profile on Facebook, even if the phone number itself was not public. Accordingly, information relating to the data subject could be linked to their phone number by anyone in possession of such a number. In 2019, unknown “third parties” automatically combined telephone numbers and matched them with Facebook profiles thanks to the above-mentioned function. In this way, telephone numbers could be assigned to identified users. This resulted in a data breach concerning 533 million people in 106 different countries. The data subject lamented that since the data breach they received phishing emails and calls. In light of the loss of control over their personal data, the data subject claimed damages for €1,000 under Article 82 GDPR. According to the court, the controller contravened to its obligation to guarantee integrity and confidentiality of data pursuant to Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and violated the principle of privacy by default and by design (Article 24 GDPR). The controller was aware of the risks that web scraping entails and still did not adopt appropriate security measures pursuant to Article 32 GDPR, such as removing the matching function described above. Concerning the existence of non-material damages pursuant to Article 82 GDPR, the court found that combining telephone numbers with other personal data potentially exposes users to several risks, including identity theft and targeted criminal activities. Therefore, an “abstract damage” could be compensated in the present case. To the contrary, no concrete negative consequence was actually proved by the data subject. In particular, the alleged phishing emails and calls could not be causally linked to the data breach, as other causal explanations were possible. In light of the above and considering that the data subject suffered

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 13 O 126/22 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

7 June 2023

Authority

DPA LGBonn

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 13 O 126/22 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: