- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 13 O 126/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court ruled that a Facebook user's phone number could be used by others to find their profile, leading to a major data breach affecting 533 million people. The user claimed damages after receiving phishing attempts, but the court found no direct link to the breach. This case highlights the risks of inadequate data protection measures.
What happened
A Facebook user's phone number was linked to their profile, allowing third parties to access their information.
Who was affected
The user was a Facebook member whose phone number was exposed to potential misuse.
What the authority found
The court decided that the company failed to ensure data integrity and confidentiality, violating GDPR requirements.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes the need for companies to adopt strong security measures to protect personal data. It serves as a warning that failure to do so can lead to significant risks for users.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, amount discrepancy, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject was a Facebook user. According to the privacy settings selected at the moment of the facts, their phone number could be used by a third person to find the data subject’s profile on Facebook, even if the phone number itself was not public. Accordingly, information relating to the data subject could be linked to their phone number by anyone in possession of such a number. In 2019, unknown “third parties” automatically combined telephone numbers and matched them with Facebook profiles thanks to the above-mentioned function. In this way, telephone numbers could be assigned to identified users. This resulted in a data breach concerning 533 million people in 106 different countries. The data subject lamented that since the data breach they received phishing emails and calls. In light of the loss of control over their personal data, the data subject claimed damages for €1,000 under Article 82 GDPR. According to the court, the controller contravened to its obligation to guarantee integrity and confidentiality of data pursuant to Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and violated the principle of privacy by default and by design (Article 24 GDPR). The controller was aware of the risks that web scraping entails and still did not adopt appropriate security measures pursuant to Article 32 GDPR, such as removing the matching function described above. Concerning the existence of non-material damages pursuant to Article 82 GDPR, the court found that combining telephone numbers with other personal data potentially exposes users to several risks, including identity theft and targeted criminal activities. Therefore, an “abstract damage” could be compensated in the present case. To the contrary, no concrete negative consequence was actually proved by the data subject. In particular, the alleged phishing emails and calls could not be causally linked to the data breach, as other causal explanations were possible. In light of the above and considering that the data subject suffered
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 13 O 126/22 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
7 June 2023
Authority
DPA LGBonn
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 13 O 126/22 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: