Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 9 Sa 73/21 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA LAGBaden-Wrttemberg28 July 2023Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that a former employee could not access personal data stored on a USB drive after their employment ended. The court decided that the warning issued to the employee was no longer necessary. This case highlights the importance of understanding data access rights after employment relationships conclude.

What happened

A former employee sought access to data on a USB drive and requested the deletion of a warning letter after their employment ended.

Who was affected

The former employee of a company who was warned for storing confidential information on a USB drive.

What the authority found

The court found that the employee had no right to access the USB data or to have the warning erased, as the employment relationship had expired.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that access rights to personal data can change after employment ends. Companies should ensure they have clear policies regarding data access and retention post-employment.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15 GDPR
Art. 82 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 82(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityLAG Baden-Württemberg

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was employed by the controller, a company. After an alleged disciplinary offence, the data subject got a warning signed by the owner (and only shareholder) of the company. In particular, the letter stated that the data subject stored confidential information about the company on a USB pen drive. The owner of the company had found the USB and confiscated it. The data subject asked for access to their personal data, including the content of the USB, claiming ownership over the latter. They also asked the warning to be erased under Article 17 GDPR. Finally, the data subject claimed their right to compensation for damages suffered as a consequence of the unlawful processing. The owner declared that data originally stored on the USB were backed up and erased from the pen drive. They refused to grant access to the data and to delete the warning. The court of first instance rejected the data subject’s claims. No erasure under Article 17 GDPR could be asked to the controller, as the employment relationship between the parties had meanwhile expired. Article 15 GDPR was not applicable either, since the data subject did not own the content of the USB, namely the confidential information unlawfully collected from the company. Therefore, there was no right to compensation pursuant to Article 82 GDPR. The data subject appealed the decision before the Regional Labour Court of Baden-Württemberg (Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, LAG Bade-Württemberg) Concerning the right to erasure of the data subject, the court overturned the first instance judgement. The court noted that a warning was no longer necessary after the termination of the employment contract between the data subject and the controller. Therefore, Article 17(1)(a) GDPR applied. Concerning the right to access, the court clarified that the case at issue was a case of co-controllership. The employer (the company) was clearly controller within the meaning of Article 4(7) GDPR. However, the owner th

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 9 Sa 73/21 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

28 July 2023

Authority

DPA LAGBaden-Wrttemberg

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 9 Sa 73/21 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: