Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case W176 2265088-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA BVwG6 October 2023Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled on a case involving a credit agency that refused to delete a person's paid-off debts from its records. The court found that keeping such data was necessary for assessing creditworthiness. This case highlights the balance between data retention and individual rights.

What happened

The court decided that the credit agency could retain information about settled debts to maintain accurate credit data.

Who was affected

A person who requested the deletion of her paid-off debts from the credit agency's records.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the credit agency had a legitimate interest in keeping records of settled debts for credit assessment purposes.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the importance of maintaining accurate credit records while also considering individual rights. Businesses should be aware of the implications of data retention policies.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12 GDPR
Art. 13 GDPR
Art. 14 GDPR
Art. 17 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityBVwG

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A data subject submitted a request to the controller, a credit agency, to delete personal data relating to her. The data in question referred to three debts in the amounts of around €24, €35 and €1,000 which she had paid off by the time the complaint was filed. The controller responded that it would not delete such data and submitted that its processing activities relate to credit data which is relevant for establishing creditworthiness of data subjects on the basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, as it has a legitimate interest to provide third parties, whose activities entail a credit risk, with accurate credit data. For these third parties it is essential to consult the database provided by the controller, in order to be able to assess the payment behavior of their potential contractual partners, such as the data subject in this case. The controller claimed that it is important to keep data relating to, among others, unpaid bills in their database, as they significantly increase the chances of future default and thus constitute relevant credit data. For the sake of accuracy under Article 5(1)(d) GDPR, the controller submitted that it is important to also keep records of debts that have been paid off, in fact, if the controller were to delete data relating to already settled debts of the data subject, this would create a distorted picture of her creditworthiness. In this case, the data subject had been sent several reminders by creditors before she actually settled her debts, whereby the creditors had to put debt recovery measures in place and suffered temporary damages from the unpaid bills. In the present case, the debts had been settled in 2019 and 2020, after being left unpaid for about three years. On 5 August 2022, the data subject brought a complaint with the DSB following the refusal by the controller to delete credit data relating to her, claiming also that the controller failed to inform her that data relating to her credit history were being saved for up to

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W176 2265088-1 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

6 October 2023

Authority

DPA BVwG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W176 2265088-1 - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: