- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case W211 2268942-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2023)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court ruled on a complaint about a secret search of a person's office where officials took pictures without permission. This decision highlights the importance of privacy rights and the need for legal grounds when processing personal data. Although no fine was imposed, the ruling emphasizes the need for proper procedures in handling sensitive information.
What happened
Officials searched a person's office and took seven pictures with a private cell phone without consent.
Who was affected
The person whose office was searched and whose privacy was violated by the officials' actions.
What the authority found
The court found that the data processing was done without a valid legal basis and violated the person's right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Why this matters
This ruling underscores the necessity for companies to have clear legal grounds for any data processing activities, especially those involving personal spaces. It serves as a reminder that privacy rights must be respected, even in official contexts.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject made a complaint against the respondent, as organ's of the respondent searched through the data subject's office in 2020 and took seven pictures on a private cell phone of the complainants office, the contents of a box and handwritten notes on files. The complaint is focused on the data processing that took place in the secret search and how the respondent violated the complainants fundamental right to privacy under the GDPR. The complaint was made in a timely manner because the complainant only found out after the oral hearing the data processing that occurred during the search of the office.The complaint was filed within the one year complaint period from the time the matter became know in connection with section 85 (4) GOG. The searched violated article 8 of the ECHR, the complainants right to a private life. It is clear the data processing was carried out, outside disciplinary or criminal proceedings exclusively on behalf of the respondent which makes it clear this was not processed out by an impartial disciplinary court. This in turn affected the judicial independence of the judge. According to section 85 (1) GOG, a prerequisite to admit a complaint is that it must violate a fundamental right to data protection by an organ that exercises judicial activity, which is not the case here as there is no connection with court or legal proceedings, it was an issue that took place in the company. The processing of data was necessary for official supervision and therefore, had no corresponding legal basis. The respondent requested the complaint to be rejected and if necessary dismissed. Initially, there was confusion over which court department this complaint needed to be assigned too, in the beginning it was not assigned to a court department as the authority in charge assumed there would be a decision-complaint procedure, eventually the court departments were assigned once the files attached were examined in the legal department and the contents w
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W211 2268942-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
19 July 2023
Authority
DPA BVwG
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W211 2268942-1 - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: