- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case W292 2267784-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2023)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court ruled on a case involving a complaint about data protection procedures. The decision clarified how complaints are handled under GDPR and the requirements for establishing non-material damages.
What happened
A data subject appealed a decision regarding the handling of their data protection complaint by the Austrian data protection authority.
Who was affected
The individual who filed the complaint regarding their personal data handling.
What the authority found
The court assessed whether the data protection authority's communication constituted a decision under GDPR, emphasizing the need for clarity in complaint handling.
Why this matters
This case illustrates the complexities of GDPR complaint processes and the importance of clear communication from authorities. It serves as a reminder for individuals to understand their rights and the procedures involved.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
In May 2018, a data subject, respresented by noyb - European Centre for Digital Rights, filed a complaint with the Austrian DPA. The latter referred the case to the Irish DPC as lead supervisory authority under Article 56 GDPR and a cooperation procedure under Article 60 GDPR was initiated. On 11 January 2023, the DSB transmitted to the data subject the final decision by the DPC in accordance with Article 60(7) GDPR and informed her that the EDPB’s binding decision under Article 65(1)(a) GDPR would be published thereafter. Two days later, on 13 January 2023, the DSB transmitted the binding decision of the EDPB of 5 December 2022 to the data subject. The DSB informed the data subject that the parts of the original complaint that were not addressed by the DPC's decision are still pending before the DPC. On 7 February 2023, the data subject filed an appeal with the BVwG, claiming that the transmission of the DPC’s decision by the DSB should be considered a partially dismissing or rejection decision within the meaning of Article 60(9) GDPR. Since the DPC and the EDPB failed to address some of the points raised in the complaint, the communications of the DSB, together with the decision of the DPC could not be interpreted as a positive decision in accordance with Article 60(7). In the complainant's view, the communication by the DSB therefore constitutes an official decisions within the meaning of [https://ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10005768&FassungVom=2019-05-09&Artikel=&Paragraf=58&Anlage=&Uebergangsrecht= section 58 et seqq. of the Austrian General Law on Administrative Procedures (Allgemeines Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, AVG)]. In its submissions, the DSB argued that Article 60(7) GDPR applied in this case and the DPC would still be handling the case. The BVwG first of all assessed whether the pronouncement of the DSB constituted a decision within the meaning of [https://ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Ge
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W292 2267784-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
18 December 2023
Authority
Datenschutzbehörde
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W292 2267784-1 - Austria (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: