Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case W258 2243523-1/9E – Court Ruling (Austria, 2024)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde11 January 2024Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court ruled that a real estate company did not fully erase a customer's personal data after they requested deletion. The court found that the company’s actions violated the customer's rights under data protection rules. This ruling stresses the importance of properly handling data deletion requests.

What happened

A real estate company failed to completely delete a customer's personal data as requested.

Who was affected

A customer who requested the deletion of their personal data from the real estate company.

What the authority found

The Austrian data protection authority determined that the company violated the customer's right to deletion under Article 17 of GDPR.

Why this matters

This case highlights the necessity for companies to ensure they fully comply with data deletion requests to protect user rights.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 17 GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 17(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityBVwG
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected, date discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A real estate development company, the controller, contacted an owner of real estate, the data subject, asking her whether she would be interested in selling her property. The data subject claimed to have requested deletion of her personal data under Article 17 GDPR but kept receiving messages from the controller thereafter. Thus, on 26 April 2020, the data subject filed a complaint with the Austrian DPA (Datenschutzbehörde, DSB). In its submissions, the controller argued that it obtains data about real estate properties on sale by requesting access to the land registry of property addresses and it processes personal data according to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Further, the controller stated that it nonetheless complied with the deletion request as it pseudonymised the data of the data subject and added a note next to the address of her property that it should no longer be consulted in the land registry. The DSB held that the controller did violate the data subject’s right to deletion as it failed to fully erase her personal data. First, according to the DSB, the interests of the data subject outweighed those of the controller and that it was still possible to identify the data subject using the address of her property. The controller decided to appeal the DSB’s decision on 14 May 2021 to the Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG), claiming that the DSB failed to properly assess the case. The controller submitted that it deleted the data of the data subject when she requested it and then her data mistakenly reappeared in her database, which is why she was contacted again by the controller. However, the controller remedied this by pseudonymising her data. Hence, the DSB should have differentiated between the two processing activities: the data subject only requested deletion of her data with respect to the first set of processing activities. As regards the second set of processing activities, the data subject never asked for erasure.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W258 2243523-1/9E in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

11 January 2024

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W258 2243523-1/9E - Austria (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: