Court case VI ZR 15/23 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A German court ruled that a health insurance company must provide a person with information about their premium increases. The court found that the person has the right to know how and why their premiums changed. This case is important because it reinforces the right of individuals to access information about their personal data.
What happened
A person requested information about premium increases from their health insurance company and took legal action when the company did not comply.
Who was affected
The person who holds a private health insurance policy with the company.
What the authority found
The court ruled that the insurance company must provide the requested information about premium increases, even for changes made before GDPR took effect.
Why this matters
This decision emphasizes that individuals have the right to access information about their personal data, which can influence how companies communicate changes to their policies.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
The data subject has private health and long-term care insurance with the controller. The controller increased the contributions in 2018 and 2020. The data subject considers the premium increases to be unlawful. Consequently, in civil court, the data subject requested information on the basis of Article 15(1) GDPR from the controller about premium increases starting from 2016, including justifications for the premium adjustment and supplements to the insurance policy. The Landsgericht Verden (Regional Court of Verden) upheld the action. The controller appealed the decision to the Oberlandesgerichts Celle (Higher Regional Court of Celle). However, the Court of Appeal held that the data subject is entitled to the asserted right to information under Article 15(1) GDPR. It found that letters from the controller to the data subject, even standard letters sent to a large number of recipients with the same content, are subject to the right to information as they contain information about the data subject. The controller appealed to the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH). The Federal Court of Justice held that the access request by the data subject cannot be affirmed based on the reasoning of the Court of Appeal. Article 15 GDPR and the GDPR as such are applicable, even if the processing occurred before the GDPR came into force in 2018. This is because the request was submitted after 2018. The CJEU previously ruled that “it is applicable to a request for access to the information referred to in that provision where the processing operations which that request concerns were carried out before the date on which that regulation became applicable, but the request was submitted after that date.” (see [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62021CJ0579 CJEU Case C-579/21], para 36). However, Article 15 GDPR cannot be used in the case at issue, because of the following reasons: Firstly, in light of the broad scope of personal data und
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case VI ZR 15/23 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
6 February 2024
Authority
DPA OLGCelle
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case VI ZR 15/23 - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: