- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case VI ZR 15/23 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A German court ruled that a person has the right to access information about their health insurance premium increases. This decision is important because it confirms that companies must provide clear information about personal data, even if the data was collected before GDPR started. It emphasizes the importance of transparency in data handling.
What happened
The court ruled that a person can request information about their health insurance premium increases from the insurance company.
Who was affected
The person who has private health and long-term care insurance with the company.
What the authority found
The court decided that the person is entitled to access information under GDPR, even if the data was processed before GDPR took effect.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the ongoing obligation for companies to be transparent about personal data. It serves as a reminder for businesses to ensure they are prepared to respond to access requests from users.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 22 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject has private health and long-term care insurance with the controller. The controller increased the contributions in 2018 and 2020. The data subject considers the premium increases to be unlawful. Consequently, in civil court, the data subject requested information on the basis of Article 15(1) GDPR from the controller about premium increases starting from 2016, including justifications for the premium adjustment and supplements to the insurance policy. The Landsgericht Verden (Regional Court of Verden) upheld the action. The controller appealed the decision to the Oberlandesgerichts Celle (Higher Regional Court of Celle). However, the Court of Appeal held that the data subject is entitled to the asserted right to information under Article 15(1) GDPR. It found that letters from the controller to the data subject, even standard letters sent to a large number of recipients with the same content, are subject to the right to information as they contain information about the data subject. The controller appealed to the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH). The Federal Court of Justice held that the access request by the data subject cannot be affirmed based on the reasoning of the Court of Appeal. Article 15 GDPR and the GDPR as such are applicable, even if the processing occurred before the GDPR came into force in 2018. This is because the request was submitted after 2018. The CJEU previously ruled that “it is applicable to a request for access to the information referred to in that provision where the processing operations which that request concerns were carried out before the date on which that regulation became applicable, but the request was submitted after that date.” (see [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62021CJ0579 CJEU Case C-579/21], para 36). However, Article 15 GDPR cannot be used in the case at issue, because of the following reasons: Firstly, in light of the broad scope of personal data und
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case VI ZR 15/23 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
6 February 2024
Authority
DPA OLGCelle
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case VI ZR 15/23 - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: