Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 9 O 158/21 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA LGBonn29 August 2022Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court dismissed a patient's claims against a hospital regarding the handling of their medical data. The ruling confirms that hospitals must provide necessary medical information but also highlights the complexities surrounding patient complaints.

What happened

The court ruled on a patient's claims regarding inadequate disclosure of medical data after surgery.

Who was affected

The patient who underwent surgery and requested access to their medical data.

What the authority found

The court found that the hospital had provided all required personal data and met its obligations under data protection laws.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the importance of hospitals fulfilling their data disclosure obligations while also addressing patient complaints effectively.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15 GDPR
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(6) GDPR
Art. 82 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(6) GDPR
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 82(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 630a BGB
Decision AuthorityLG Bonn

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff, who suffered severe shoulder pain and had an unstable biceps tendon, underwent surgery at the defendant hospital on 10 January 2019. Despite an elective medical agreement with the defendant anesthesiologist, he did not participate in the surgery due to unavailability. Post-surgery, the plaintiff reported numbness in her left cheek and speech difficulties, which she claimed were initially dismissed by the hospital staff. Subsequent medical evaluations found no acute issues, but a suspected hypoglossal nerve palsy was diagnosed. The plaintiff declined the recommended corticosteroid therapy. On 16 February 2019, the plaintiff requested full disclosure of her medical data under GDPR from the hospital, which provided her treatment documentation, claiming it was complete. In November 2019, she initiated an independent evidence procedure, resulting in an expert report. The plaintiff claimed the surgery caused nerve damage due to faulty intubation and positioning and that the hospital's response to her complaints was inadequate and delayed. She also alleged insufficient information on corticosteroid therapy, leading to her rejection of the treatment, and claimed ongoing health issues and job loss due to the surgery complications. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, ruling that no treatment errors occurred during the surgery or in the hospital's response to her complaints. The expert testimonies confirmed that the surgery and postoperative care were conducted according to medical standards. The court found the plaintiff's positioning and intubation during surgery to be proper and the complications she experienced to be rare, inherent risks not resulting from malpractice. The documentation of the plaintiff's care was deemed sufficient, and the plaintiff's claim of earlier complaint communication was unsupported. Regarding the GDPR claims, the court held that the hospital had provided all required personal data and adequately fulfilled its disclosure o

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 9 O 158/21 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

29 August 2022

Authority

DPA LGBonn

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 9 O 158/21 - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: