Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case VI ZR 370/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA LGDarmstadt14 May 2024Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that a bank must provide a customer with complete information about their personal data after the customer claimed the bank's response was incomplete. The court's decision emphasizes the right of individuals to access their personal data. This ruling is important for ensuring transparency in data handling.

What happened

A court ordered a bank to provide a customer with complete access to their personal data after the bank's response was deemed insufficient.

Who was affected

A customer who had a contract with the bank and sought access to their personal data.

What the authority found

The court found that the bank did not adequately respond to the customer's request for information about their personal data.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces the rights of individuals to access their personal data and holds companies accountable for transparency. It highlights the importance of clear communication regarding data handling practices.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 13(1)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 13(1)(b) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityBGH
Reviewed AuthorityLG Darmstadt (Germany)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject had a contract with a bank (the controller) from 1986 to 2000. Another bank informed the data subject that the controller had a claim against the data subject based on a Schufa (credit ranking agency) entry. Because of this, the data subject could not get a loan. Subsequently, the data subject requested access from the controller about the type and the scope of the personal data stored about the data subject. The controller objected to this request, stating that the request was too extensive and provided information to the extent that it considered was lawful. The data subject argued that this information was incomplete and asked again for access. The controller refused to provide further information. The data subject then filed a lawsuit at the District Court of Seligenstadt (Amtsgericht Seligenstadt - AG Seligenstadt) against the incomplete answer to the access request and claimed non-material damages. The District Court then ordered the controller to provide access under Article 15(1)(a) - (h) GDPR, and additionally the means of data processing, the media on which the data was stored, the frequency of deletion of the data subject's personal data, each location where the data was stored, whether a cloud was used for storage, which data was deleted in the last twelve months, the technical and organisational measures for processing and profiling of the data subject's personal data, how security was ensured, which data threats occurred, and the name of the data protection officer (DPO). However, the District Court did reject the compensation for non-material damages. The data subject appealed the decision at the Regional Court of Darmstadt (Landgericht Darmstadt - LG Darmstadt) and requested the Regional Court to order the controller to provide complete information under Article 15 GDPR, and reformulated its request to include all notes and assessments on the data subject, the algorithms used by the controller to evaluate the data, all processors

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case VI ZR 370/22 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

14 May 2024

Authority

DPA LGDarmstadt

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case VI ZR 370/22 - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: