Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 5 O 151/19 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA LGSaarbrcken22 November 2021Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Germany looked into how to handle cases of non-material damage under GDPR. They asked important questions about how to assess compensation for personal data issues. This matters because it could shape how companies handle data protection claims in the future.

What happened

The court examined the concept of non-material damage in GDPR and how compensation should be assessed.

Who was affected

Individuals whose personal data might be affected by breaches of data protection rules.

What the authority found

The court sought clarification on how to interpret non-material damage and compensation under GDPR.

Why this matters

This inquiry could influence future legal cases regarding personal data and compensation. Companies should be aware that how they handle data breaches may be scrutinized more closely.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 29 GDPR
Art. 83 GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
Art. 82(2) GDPR
Art. 82(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 29(GDPR)
Art. 82(1) GDPR
Art. 82(2) GDPR
Art. 82(3) GDPR
Art. 83(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityLG Saarbrücken

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Facts pending decision. Questions referred: 1. In the light of recital 85 and the third sentence of recital 146 of the GDPR, is the concept of ‘non-material damage’ in Article 82(1) of the GDPR to be understood as covering any impairment of the protected legal position, irrespective of the other effects and materiality of that impairment? 2. Is liability for compensation under Article 82(3) of the GDPR excluded by the fact that the infringement is attributed to human error in the individual case on the part of a person acting under the authority of the processor or controller within the meaning of Article 29 of the GDPR? 3. Is it permissible or necessary to base the assessment of compensation for non-material damage on the criteria for determining fines set out in Article 83 of the GDPR, in particular in Article 83(2) and 83(5) of the GDPR? 4. Must the compensation be determined for each individual infringement, or are several infringements – or at least several infringements of the same nature – penalised by means of an overall amount of compensation, which is not determined by adding up individual amounts but is based on an evaluative overall assessment?

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 5 O 151/19 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

22 November 2021

Authority

DPA LGSaarbrcken

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 5 O 151/19 - Germany (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: