Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case W287 2248365-1/12E – Court Ruling (Austria, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA BVwG19 September 2024Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court case in Austria involved a journalist's request for information about police officers, which was denied due to privacy concerns. This case illustrates the balance between public interest and individual privacy rights.

What happened

A journalist's request for information on the outcome of police officers' interrogation was denied by the state police department.

Who was affected

The journalist seeking information about the police officers was affected by the denial.

What the authority found

The court upheld the state police department's decision, stating that the officers' privacy rights outweighed the journalist's request for information.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the challenges in balancing public interest with privacy rights. It serves as a reminder for journalists to consider privacy implications when seeking information.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§1 DSG
Article 20(4) B-VG
Decision AuthorityBVwG

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A journalist submitted a query on the outcome of an interrogation of two police officers to the state police department. The state police department responded that due to paragraph [https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/1999/165/A1P1/NOR40139563?ResultFunctionToken=5fed9deb-b9d5-47fc-901c-04b45e84e503&Position=1&SkipToDocumentPage=True&Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Kundmachungsorgan=&Index=&Titel=&Gesetzesnummer=&VonArtikel=&BisArtikel=&VonParagraf=&BisParagraf=&VonAnlage=&BisAnlage=&Typ=&Kundmachungsnummer=&Unterzeichnungsdatum=&FassungVom=05.11.2024&VonInkrafttretedatum=&BisInkrafttretedatum=&VonAusserkrafttretedatum=&BisAusserkrafttretedatum=&NormabschnittnummerKombination=Und&ImRisSeitVonDatum=&ImRisSeitBisDatum=&ImRisSeit=Undefined&ResultPageSize=100&Suchworte=Datenschutzgesetz 1(1) of the Austrian National Data Protection Act] (Datenschutzgesetz – DSG) the provision of information was not possible. In its reasoning the state police department highlighted that the police officers in question were identifiable through publicly available video footage. It further stated that the journalist did not show an outweighing interest which would warrant the provision of information. The journalist responded to the state police department explaining that he is not interested in personal data on the police officers but merely requests to know the outcome of the interrogation which he was informed about. He further submitted that he does not intend to publish the provided information. The state police department explained that providing the information would enable drawing conclusions on whether the officers were subject to disciplinary measures which in turn affects their standing as employees and therefore their concerns their right to privacy. The journalist filed a complaint on the 6 October 2021 alleging that the state police department had not objectively balanced the interests of the police officers with the journalists request for information. The complaint was forwarded t

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W287 2248365-1/12E in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

19 September 2024

Authority

DPA BVwG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W287 2248365-1/12E - Austria (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: