CTC Externalización, S.L. – €360,000 Fine (Spain, 2024)

€360,000Agencia Española de Protección de Datos12 February 2024Spain
final
Fine

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

On 14 February 2022, a data subject filed a complaint with the Spanish DPA (AEPD) against their employer, CTC Externalización, S.L. (the controller), which collected fingerprint data from employees to implement a sign-in system. In its defense brief, the controller stated that the fingerprint scanner was an authentication system, not an identification system. As such, it claimed that fingerprints were not stored; instead, the fingerprint reader generated a numeric identifier that matched the fingerprint. The numeric identifier, not the fingerprint, was then stored in an encrypted system that compared the generated numeric identifiers. The fingerprint was allegedly erased immediately. As result, the controller claimed that it was impossible to reproduce the fingerprint from the numeric identifier. The controller also noted that it provided a disclosure in the employee portal concerning the data processing. The AEPD concluded that the controller violated Articles 13, 32, and 35 GDPR and imposed a fine of € 360,000. First, the AEPD noted that the processing disclosure made available in the employee portal violated Article 13(2)(d) and (e) GDPR because it was inaccurate, overly general and insufficiently informative. The clause concerning processing only mentioned that a fingerprint sign-in system was being implemented; it provided no information about the collection, processing or storage of fingerprint data. The clause referred generally to a number of processing activities and purposes and invoked contract as a legal basis for all of them. In assessing the disclosure's adequacy, the AEPD took note of the controller's amendments to the disclosure. The controller’s updates referred specifically to the fingerprint processing and cited legal obligations under national law as the legal basis for this processing. They also articulated a different data retention period, further indicating the inaccuracy of the original disclosure. Finally, at no point did the controller

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 13 GDPR
Art. 32 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 13 GDPR
Art. 32 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Source verified 6 March 2026
verified correct
Full Legal Summary

On 14 February 2022, a data subject filed a complaint with the Spanish DPA (AEPD) against their employer, CTC Externalización, S.L. (the controller), which collected fingerprint data from employees to implement a sign-in system. In its defense brief, the controller stated that the fingerprint scanner was an authentication system, not an identification system. As such, it claimed that fingerprints were not stored; instead, the fingerprint reader generated a numeric identifier that matched the fingerprint. The numeric identifier, not the fingerprint, was then stored in an encrypted system that compared the generated numeric identifiers. The fingerprint was allegedly erased immediately. As result, the controller claimed that it was impossible to reproduce the fingerprint from the numeric identifier. The controller also noted that it provided a disclosure in the employee portal concerning the data processing. The AEPD concluded that the controller violated Articles 13, 32, and 35 GDPR and imposed a fine of € 360,000. First, the AEPD noted that the processing disclosure made available in the employee portal violated Article 13(2)(d) and (e) GDPR because it was inaccurate, overly general and insufficiently informative. The clause concerning processing only mentioned that a fingerprint sign-in system was being implemented; it provided no information about the collection, processing or storage of fingerprint data. The clause referred generally to a number of processing activities and purposes and invoked contract as a legal basis for all of them. In assessing the disclosure's adequacy, the AEPD took note of the controller's amendments to the disclosure. The controller’s updates referred specifically to the fingerprint processing and cited legal obligations under national law as the legal basis for this processing. They also articulated a different data retention period, further indicating the inaccuracy of the original disclosure. Finally, at no point did the controller

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for CTC Externalización, S.L. in ES

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Fine Date

12 February 2024

Authority

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos

Fine Amount

€360,000

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7777

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. CTC Externalización, S.L. - Spain (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: