- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 27 U 2473/24 e – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A German court ruled that a credit rating agency could keep a craftsman's debt information even after it was paid. The court decided that the agency's need to assess credit risk outweighed the craftsman's request to erase the data. This case highlights how long negative credit information can impact individuals.
What happened
The court upheld the credit rating agency's decision to retain a craftsman's debt information for credit assessment purposes.
Who was affected
A craftsman who had a debt entry related to a payment default was affected by this ruling.
What the authority found
The court found that the credit rating agency had a valid reason to process the craftsman's data, as it was necessary for assessing credit risk under GDPR.
Why this matters
This ruling shows that courts may prioritize the interests of credit agencies over individual requests for data erasure. It serves as a reminder for individuals to understand how their credit information can be used long after debts are settled.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The controller is a credit rating agency maintaining a database with 68,000,000 Germany-related datasets. The contractual partners of the controller transmit data from their customers to the controller. The controller stores the data it receives from its partners. In turn it calculates and provides its partners with information on which the statistical risk of payment default. The data subject is a craftsman and requested the erasure of an entry on his creditworthiness stored by the controller regarding a debt between €300 and €400 for which payment had been in default for months. The controller rejected the request. Consequently, the data subject filed a lawsuit requesting erasure of the entry based on Article 17 GDPR with the Regional Court of Augsburg (Landesgericht Augsburg - LG Augsburg). The court found the claim to be unfounded as the controller was justified in processing the data under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The data subject appealed this decision and brought forward that the controller should have notified the data subject of the data processing through push-notifications. In the Appeals process the Higher Regional Court Munich (Oberlandesgericht München - OLG München) fully upheld the decision of the first instance. It maintained that the interest of the controller for storing the data is not overridden by legitimate interests of the data subject. Even though the debt was eventually settled the information stored by the controller remained suitable for assessing the credit score. The court also agreed with the first instance that even the payment history on small amounts (in the case at hand an amount below €400,00) is appropriate for future risk assessments. Regarding the fact, that the data subject had eventually paid the claim the court agreed with the first instance that even a late payment is relevant for risk predications. The court held that while the controller is obliged to inform the data subject in accordance with Article 13 and 14 GDPR, t
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 27 U 2473/24 e in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
19 November 2024
Authority
DPA LGAugsburg
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 27 U 2473/24 e - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: