Enforcing jurisdiction
Luxembourg · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

ASBL AA and B v. Direct Tax Administration (ACD) – Court Ruling (Luxembourg, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA CourAdministrative12 December 2024Luxembourg
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Luxembourg court ruled on a case involving a bank's sharing of personal data with tax authorities. The court found that the complainant, a dual citizen, could not stop the bank from sharing their information as it was required by law. This case illustrates the limits of personal data control in legal contexts.

What happened

The court upheld the bank's decision to share the complainant's personal data with tax authorities.

Who was affected

The complainant, a French and American citizen, was affected by the data sharing.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the data sharing was necessary to comply with legal obligations, and the complainant's request to stop it was denied.

Why this matters

This case highlights the challenges individuals face in controlling their personal data when legal obligations are involved. It serves as a reminder for users to understand the legal frameworks surrounding data sharing.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 2(2)(b) GDPR
Art. 2(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 96 GDPR
Art. 17(3)(b) GDPR
Art. 18(1)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 2(2)(b) GDPR
Art. 2(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(b) GDPR
Art. 18(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 96(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 11 of the Luxembourg Constitution
Luxembourg law of the 1st August 2018 about the organisation of the Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données (CNPD, the Luxembourg data protection supervisory authority) and the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 replacing Directive 95/46 EC
Luxembourg law of the 2nd August 2002 about the implementation of Directive 95/46 EC
LuxembourgForeign Account Tax Compliance Act « loi du 24 juillet 2015
Decision AuthorityCour Administrative
Reviewed AuthorityCour Administrative (Luxembourg)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 19 May 2020, a Luxembourg bank informed the complainant that, by 30 June 2020, they would transmit the complainant's bank account information to the Luxembourg fiscal authorities. Afterwards, by latest the 30th September 2020, the Luxembourg fiscal authorities will share this information with the US fiscal authorities. The complainant, a French and American citizen connected to the association for the protection of civil rights ASBL, turned to the Luxembourg direct Tax Office (hereinafter: ACD), explaining that the data to be transferred on the basis of the FATCA concern identification, financial and economic data, i.e. personal data as defined in the GDPR. Thus, the complainant requested the ACD to erase the personal data and immediately discontinue the exchange of information between the ACD and the American fiscal authorities. The director of the ACD rejected this request, stating that the ASBL is not a data subject and the processing of the personal data of the complainant was necessary to respect the Luxembourg FATCA Agreement law to which the ACD is subject, Thus, in their view the request to restrict processing is not justified. The complainant turned to the Luxembourg Administrative Tribunal, which rejected the injunctive request to suspend the information sharing with the US fiscal authorities. The Tribunal also declared itself entitled neither to decide on the decision of the ACD, nor to invalidate it. As to the merit, the Tribunal found the request for invalidation unfounded, rejecting the request for a reimbursement and ordering the complainant to pay the costs. The ACD challenged the receivability of appeal. In relation to the GDPR-related questions, the court held the following. * Whether the GDPR was applicable to the data transfer With regards to the applicability of the GDPR and the law of the 1st August 2018 about the organisation of the Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données (CNPD, the Luxembourg data protection supervisory aut

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for ASBL AA and B v. Direct Tax Administration (ACD) in LU

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

12 December 2024

Authority

DPA CourAdministrative

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. ASBL AA and B v. Direct Tax Administration (ACD) - Luxembourg (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: