Stichting Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR) – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2023)

Court Ruling
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens17 July 2023Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that Stichting Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR) charged users for accessing their personal data, which is against privacy laws. This matters because it shows that companies must provide free access to personal data, especially in digital formats. The court reduced the initial fine from €830,000 to €668,000 due to the company's appeal.

What happened

The court found that BKR charged a fee for electronic access to personal data, violating GDPR rules.

Who was affected

Individuals who requested access to their personal data from BKR.

What the authority found

The court held that BKR violated Articles 12(2) and 12(5) GDPR by limiting free access and charging fees.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent that companies must facilitate free and easy access to personal data. It serves as a warning for organizations to comply with GDPR requirements regarding data access.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 12(5) GDPR
Decision AuthorityRb. Gelderland
Reviewed AuthorityAP (The Netherlands)
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In May 2018, Stichting Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR, the controller) began charging a fee to data subjects for requesting access to their data in a digital format. Data subjects could obtain a paper copy of their data for free, but only once a year. Following the DPA’s investigation, the controller has modified its processes. Since April 2019 data subjects have been able to access their data for free. In addition, in March 2019 the controller changed the number of times a year data subjects can receive a paper copy of their data by post. The Dutch DPA found that this practice was an infringement of privacy legislation, and imposed a fine of €830,000. controller then appealed in court. The court ruled that controller violated both Article 12(2) and Article 12(5) GDPR. The court found that controller's policy of limiting free access to once a year and charging for electronic access was inconsistent with the GDPR's requirements. The court emphasized that the GDPR requires data controllers to facilitate individuals' rights to access their data easily and free of charge, especially when data is processed electronically. The court rejected controller's argument that the GDPR's rules were unclear, stating that controller, as a professional organization, should have been aware of its obligations. The court acknowledged that the violations were related and reduced the fine by 20% due to the interconnected nature of the breaches. However, the court also found that the original fine of €830,000 was disproportionate and further reduced it to €668,000.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Stichting Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR) in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

17 July 2023

Authority

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Stichting Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR) - Netherlands (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: