- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 4 U 120/24 e – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A telecom provider shared a customer's data with a credit agency to prevent fraud, but the customer claimed this was unlawful. The court ruled that the telecom provider acted within its rights to disclose the data for fraud prevention. This decision clarifies the balance between privacy and legitimate business interests.
What happened
A telecom provider disclosed a customer's data to a credit agency to prevent potential fraud.
Who was affected
The customer whose data was shared with SCHUFA Holding AG by the telecom provider.
What the authority found
The court found that the telecom provider had a legitimate interest in preventing fraud and lawfully disclosed the data.
Why this matters
This ruling reinforces that companies can share data for legitimate interests like fraud prevention, but they must ensure they comply with privacy laws.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A telecom provider (the controller) concluded a contract with a customer (the data subject). Afterwards, the controller forwarded the subject’s data to the credit information agency SCHUFA Holding AG. The disclosure of the data were base on the controller’s interest in preventing fraud. The data subject brought an action with the Regional Court of Würzburg. He claimed that the disclosure of his data was unlawful. So, he required compensation for non-material damages under Article 82 GDPR, injunctive relief, and a declaration that the controller would be liable for all future material and non-material damages caused by the disclosure. The Regional Court of Würzburg dismissed the requests. The data subject then appealed the ruling with the Higher Regional Court of Bamberg. The Court dismissed the request and held that the controller lawfully disclosed the data to Schufa. In its analysis of the controller’s legitimate interest, the Court referred to the three requirements laid out by the case law of the Court of JusticeCJEU, Case C-252/21, Meta Platform and Others, 4 August 2023, margins 105 and following (available [https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=276478&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=60751 here]). and held that they were fulfilled in the case at hand. First, the Court held that the controller had a real and legitimate interest in avoiding fraud. In this regard, the Court pointed out that many individuals conclude a large number of phone plans in a short time, without paying for those plans, in order to keep the phones that come with them. Credit information agencies such as the controller can help telecom providers avoid such frauds. Furthermore, the Court pointed out that Recital 47 GDPR lists fraud prevention as an example of a legitimate interest of the data controller. Then, the Court held that the processing of the data was necessary to prevent fraud. In the Court’s view, it was not apparent that less
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 4 U 120/24 e in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
5 May 2025
Authority
DPA LGWrzburg
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 4 U 120/24 e - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: