Court case KHO:2025:51 – Court Ruling (Finland, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA KHO11 June 2025Finland
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A data subject made an access request to a bank (controller) regarding log data concerning him and in particular the identity of the employees who processed his customer data between 1 November and 31 December 2013, the purpose of the processing and the dates on which the data were accessed. The data subject filed a complaint with the DPA requesting access to this data. In August 2020, the DPA dismissed his complaint stating that no order for access to the data will be issued because the log data in question do not constitute data concerning the data subject but they relate specifically to the employees who have processed the customer data. The data subject appealed this decision to the court of first instance (Administrative Court of Eastern Finland). In September 2021, the court of first instance requested a preliminary ruling from the CJEU asking if the right of access of the data subject under Article 15(1) GDPR is to be interpreted so that it includes information collected by the controller which shows who, when and for what purpose he has processed the data subject's personal data, in particular when it concerns data relating to the controller's employees. In June 2023 the CJEU ([https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=274867&pageIndex=0&doclang=DE&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1 Case C-579/21]) held, inter alia, that Article 15(1) GDDPR must be interpreted as meaning that the information relating to the times and purposes of the searching of a person's personal data constitutes information that a data subject is entitled to obtain from the controller under that provision. By contrast, that provision does not establish such a right to information concerning the identity of the employees of the controller who have carried out the searches under the authority and on the instructions of the controller, except where that information is necessary to enable the data subject to exercise effectively the rights conferred on him by the GDPR and

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 15(1) GDPR
Decision AuthorityKHO
Full Legal Summary

A data subject made an access request to a bank (controller) regarding log data concerning him and in particular the identity of the employees who processed his customer data between 1 November and 31 December 2013, the purpose of the processing and the dates on which the data were accessed. The data subject filed a complaint with the DPA requesting access to this data. In August 2020, the DPA dismissed his complaint stating that no order for access to the data will be issued because the log data in question do not constitute data concerning the data subject but they relate specifically to the employees who have processed the customer data. The data subject appealed this decision to the court of first instance (Administrative Court of Eastern Finland). In September 2021, the court of first instance requested a preliminary ruling from the CJEU asking if the right of access of the data subject under Article 15(1) GDPR is to be interpreted so that it includes information collected by the controller which shows who, when and for what purpose he has processed the data subject's personal data, in particular when it concerns data relating to the controller's employees. In June 2023 the CJEU ([https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=274867&pageIndex=0&doclang=DE&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1 Case C-579/21]) held, inter alia, that Article 15(1) GDDPR must be interpreted as meaning that the information relating to the times and purposes of the searching of a person's personal data constitutes information that a data subject is entitled to obtain from the controller under that provision. By contrast, that provision does not establish such a right to information concerning the identity of the employees of the controller who have carried out the searches under the authority and on the instructions of the controller, except where that information is necessary to enable the data subject to exercise effectively the rights conferred on him by the GDPR and

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case KHO:2025:51 in FI

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

11 June 2025

Authority

DPA KHO

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case KHO:2025:51 - Finland (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: