Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case 10 O 4/24 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA LGItzehoe30 September 2024Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled on a case involving a telecommunications company that shared user data without consent. The decision emphasizes that companies must obtain consent before sharing personal information. This case sets a precedent for how user data should be handled.

What happened

The telecommunications company transmitted user data to credit agencies without obtaining consent.

Who was affected

The individual whose personal data was shared with credit information agencies without their permission.

What the authority found

The court found that the company violated GDPR by not securing consent for data sharing.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces the necessity for companies to prioritize user consent when handling personal data. It serves as a reminder that failing to do so can lead to legal challenges and loss of trust.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityLG Itzehoe

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 22 November 2019, a data subject entered into a mobile phone contract with the controller (a telecommunications company). The telecommunications company transmitted to 2 credit information agencies so called 'positive data' about the data subject, in particular information about the commissioning and execution of the contract which included data required to identify the respective person. The data subject received a leaflet regarding the transmission of data to S with a reference to a right of objection. On 19 October 2023, one of the credit information agencies published a press release stating that it would delete customer account information relating to the constoller. This decision was due to following the assessment of the Data Protection Conference of the German States (DSK) and the body of the independent German federal and state data protection supervisory authorities that the transmission and processing of data from the telecommunications sector by credit information agencies for credit scoring cannot be based on a "legitimate interest" according to Article 6(1)(a) of the GDPR and consent is required. The data subject filed a case before the court of first instance (Regional Court of Itzehoe- LG Itzehoe) requesting that the controller is ordered to compensate them for immaterial damages for the data protection breach, cease and desist transmitting their personal data to the credit information agencies and compensate them for all future damages that the plaintiff has suffered and/or will suffer as a result of the unauthorized transmission. They claim that they did not consent to having their personal data shared with the credit information agencies and that the transmission is unlawful and violated Article 6(1) and Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. They alleged it caused non-material damage in the form of loss of control over their data deriving from the transmission, impact on economic decisions and financial freedom, and suffering fear of data loss and sleep dis

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 10 O 4/24 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

30 September 2024

Authority

DPA LGItzehoe

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 10 O 4/24 - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: