- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
Court case W108 2277566-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2024)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court ruled that a social insurance provider lawfully disclosed a person's rehabilitation center information during legal proceedings. This case illustrates the complexities of data protection laws, especially regarding sensitive health information. It emphasizes the need for organizations to understand their legal obligations when sharing personal data.
What happened
A social insurance provider disclosed a person's rehabilitation center location as part of a court request.
Who was affected
The individual whose sensitive health information was disclosed to the court.
What the authority found
The court found that the disclosure was lawful under legal obligations and necessary for public interest.
Why this matters
This case demonstrates the legal boundaries for sharing sensitive data in judicial contexts. Organizations must navigate these rules carefully to protect individuals' privacy.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
On 27 June 2022, the District Court issued a request to the controller — a statutory social insurance carrier — asking for the name and address of the therapy facility where the data subject was undergoing rehabilitation. The request was part of ongoing enforcement proceedings against the data subject. The controller received this request on 11 July 2022. Relying on its statutory duty to provide administrative assistance under Section 360(1) ASVG, in conjunction with Section 129 B-KUVG and Section 89h GOG, the controller disclosed the name and address of the rehabilitation center. The duration of the data subject’s stay had already been communicated to the court separately. On 30 August 2022, the controller informed the data subject in writing about the data disclosure and explained the legal basis for this action. The controller argued that the request did not appear to exceed the court’s lawful authority and that only minimal and necessary data had been shared. Moreover, the controller maintained that if the information disclosed qualified as special category data under Article 9(1) GDPR, the disclosure was nonetheless lawful pursuant to Article 9(2)(f) GDPR, which permits processing necessary for the establishment, exercise, or defense of legal claims or judicial activities. On 10 January 2023, the data subject filed a complaint with DPA under Article 77 GDPR and Section 24 DSG. The data subject alleged a violation of the right to confidentiality under Section 1 DSG and Article 9 GDPR, asserting that the controller had unlawfully transferred sensitive health-related data to the court without a proper legal basis or consent. The data subject emphasized that the location of the rehabilitation facility could allow for inferences about health status, and that the controller failed to clarify exactly what data had been transferred despite multiple requests for access. At the request of the DPA, the controller submitted a response on 17 February 2023, reaffirming that
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W108 2277566-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
7 October 2024
Authority
DPA BVwG
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W108 2277566-1 - Austria (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: