- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case W292 2235791-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court ruled that a company provided insufficient information about who received a person's data. The person had requested details about their data access rights. This case emphasizes the need for companies to be clear and specific when responding to data access requests.
What happened
A company did not provide specific information about the recipients of a person's personal data when requested.
Who was affected
The individual who requested information about their personal data and its recipients.
What the authority found
The court found that the company met its obligations by providing general information, as specific details could not be identified.
Why this matters
This ruling stresses the importance of transparency in data handling and the need for companies to have proper documentation to respond to access requests.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 23 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject lodged a complaint with the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB), alleging a violation of its right of access under Article 15 GDPR. Specifically, the data subject requested information from the controller about the recipients and categories of recipients to whom its personal data had been disclosed. In response, the controller provided a general list of all potential recipients but did not specify individual recipients. The DSB held that the controller had violated Article 15 by providing incomplete information. The controller appealed this decision to the Federal Administrative Court. The Court upheld the controller’s appeal. Referring to CJEU case law, the Court confirmed that data subjects have a right to be informed of specific recipients under Article 15(1)(c) GDPR, unless identification is impossible or the request is manifestly unfounded, in which case only categories of recipients must be provided. Applying this standard, the Court found that the controller had fulfilled its obligation by naming all potential processors, explaining the purposes of data transfers, and identifying processors who had not received the data. Since the specific recipients could not be identified due to a lack of documentation, documentation that is not legally required, the Court concluded that the information provided was sufficient and complete.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W292 2235791-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W292 2235791-1 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: