- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case Ra 2023/04/0271 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court ruled that a credit information agency properly handled a user's request for access to their personal data. The court found that the agency provided sufficient information about how the user's creditworthiness score was calculated. This case illustrates the importance of transparency in how personal data is processed.
What happened
A court dismissed a complaint against a credit information agency regarding inadequate information on a user's credit score.
Who was affected
A user who sought detailed information about their creditworthiness score from a credit information agency.
What the authority found
The court decided that the agency's response to the user's access request met GDPR standards and did not violate their rights.
Why this matters
This ruling reinforces that companies must provide clear information about personal data processing. Businesses should ensure they can explain how they calculate scores or assessments based on personal data.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 23 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A data subject lodged a data protection complaint against a credit information agency (the controller) with the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB). The data subject requested access under Article 15 GDPR to understand how his personal data were processed, specifically regarding the calculation of his creditworthiness score, including the logic, factors, and rules applied. At that time, the controller maintained two datasets about him: one as a private individual and one as a sole trader. Following a prior deletion request by the data subject, the controller deleted certain data related to his previous debt settlement proceedings. Regarding the controller's response to the access request, the data subject argued that provided information was inadequate.He claimed that he was entitled to a full explanation of how the score was generated and how the underlying data influenced it. The DSB initially sided with the data subject, finding that the controller violated Article 15 GDPR by deleting one dataset after the access request and providing insufficient information on the remaining dataset. The DSB ordered the controller to clarify and supplement the information provided. The controller further appealed to the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG), which overturned the DSB’s decision. It found that the deletion of the dataset had been at the request of the data subject, and therefore did not constitute a violation. Regarding the second dataset, the court held that the access provided was sufficient because the creditworthiness score value of 0.01 was a manually assigned neutral baseline, not a result of an automated decision or profiling. Consequently, no automated decision-making under Article 22 GDPR occurred, and the data subject received adequate information about the sources, parameters, and general methodology for future creditworthiness assessments. The data subject then filed an extraordinary revision with the Administrative Supreme Court (VwGH) . The S
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case Ra 2023/04/0271 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
13 November 2025
Authority
DPA BVwG
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case Ra 2023/04/0271 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: