Centre Hospitalier Eaubonne Montmorency – Court Ruling (France, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA TAdeCergy-Pontois11 December 2025France
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A French hospital's court case ended with a ruling that denied a patient's request to change her medical records. The court decided that the initial diagnosis was based on subjective assessments and couldn't be corrected just because a later diagnosis was different. This case shows the challenges patients face when trying to amend their medical information.

What happened

The court rejected a patient's appeal to rectify her medical records after a different diagnosis was made.

Who was affected

The patient who sought to change her medical diagnosis in the hospital records.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the original diagnosis was valid and could not be changed under the right to rectification.

Why this matters

This case highlights the complexities of medical records and the importance of accurate documentation. Patients should be aware that changing medical records can be difficult, even with new information.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 16(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)
View original scraped data
Art. 16(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityCAA
Reviewed AuthorityTA de Cergy-Pontois (France)
Source verified 23 March 2026
articles corrected
authority corrected
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was hospitalised in the Eaubonne Montmorency Hospital Centre (the controller) in 2019. The first medical report created at the time of hospitalisation indicated a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder, among others. The data subject showed that the controller issued a second medical report during the same hospital visit with a diagnosis of an adjustment disorder. Furthermore, she submitted medical reports from other hospitals ruling out the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. In 2020, the data subject made a request to the controller for the rectification of the initial medical diagnosis under Article 16 GDPR and Article 17 GDPR. The controller rejected her request and the data subject filed a petition before the Administrative Court of Cergy-Pontoise for an order to correct the medical records. The petition was rejected by the court. The data subject filed an appeal with the Administrative Court of Appeals of Versailles to overturn the judgment of the Administrative Court of Cergy-Pontoise. In the appeal, the data subject sought the same order for rectification. The court rejected the data subject’s appeal. The court noted that the initial diagnosis was the result of subjective medical assessments of the data subject’s state of health. Moreover, the court emphasised that a different subsequent diagnosis did not imply that the initial diagnosis was inaccurate. Therefore, the court found that the diagnosis cannot be subject to the right of rectification.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Centre Hospitalier Eaubonne Montmorency in FR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

11 December 2025

Authority

DPA TAdeCergy-Pontois

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Centre Hospitalier Eaubonne Montmorency - France (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: