Amazon France Logistique – Court Ruling (France, 2025)

Court Ruling
Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés23 December 2025France
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Amazon France Logistique won a court ruling that allowed them to process certain employee performance indicators without violating data protection laws. The court found that their use of these indicators was justified under the legitimate interest rule. This case shows that companies can use performance data if they balance it with employee privacy rights.

What happened

Amazon France Logistique processed employee performance indicators without a legal basis initially, but the court ruled it was lawful under legitimate interest.

Who was affected

Employees of Amazon France Logistique whose performance data was being processed.

What the authority found

The court ruled that Amazon's processing of performance indicators was lawful under GDPR's legitimate interest provision, despite some violations regarding data minimization.

Why this matters

This ruling clarifies that companies can use performance data for management purposes, provided they respect privacy rights. It encourages businesses to carefully assess their data processing practices to ensure compliance.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityCE
Reviewed AuthorityCNIL (France)
Source verified 17 March 2026
amount discrepancy
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In 2023 the French DPA (CNIL) found that, among other things, Amazon France Logistique (the controller) processed three indicators related to the work performance of their employees without a legal basis. The DPA took this finding into consideration when deciding on the fine issued to the controller, i.e. €32 million. The controller contested the decision. The Supreme Administrative Court found that the three indicators (i.e. the stow machine gun indicator, the idle time indicator, and the latency time indicator) were processed lawfully under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (i.e. legitimate interest). The Court noted that the purpose of the indicators was the management of stock and order (stock machine gun indicator) and to flag interruptions in activity that cannot be detected by the other indicators used in order to identify their causes (idle time indicator and latency time indicator). The Court also noted that the right to private life of the employees was not excessively infringed upon by the processing of these indicators. In contrast, the Court maintained the DPA’s decision regarding the controller's violation of Article 5 GDPR, specifically the principle of data minimisation and accountability, by collecting a disproportionate amount of data and storing them for 31 days without showing the need for such processing. Therefore, the Court found that the controller processed the indicators based on a legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR and reduced the initial fine from €32 million to €15 million.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

23 December 2025

Authority

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Amazon France Logistique - France (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: