- Enforcing jurisdiction
- European Union · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2017)
CJEU precedent (Directive 95/46/EC, pre-GDPR)
This is a Court of Justice judgment predating the GDPR. It interprets Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive). It is not a cookie or ePrivacy case and is excluded from cookie statistics and the Risk Calculator.
The Court of Justice decided that the police did not have to share a minor passenger's personal details after a tram accident. This ruling is significant for companies that may need to request personal data, as it clarifies the limits on what can be disclosed.
What happened
The Latvian police refused to disclose a minor passenger's identity card number and address after a tram accident.
Who was affected
The minor passenger involved in the tram accident and the tram company seeking the information.
What the authority found
The court ruled that disclosing personal data must consider the legitimate interests of all parties involved, including privacy rights.
Why this matters
This case highlights the importance of protecting personal data and sets a precedent for how companies should handle requests for sensitive information.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
It all started with an accident between a tram and a taxi on the streets of Riga, the capital of Latvia. A minor passenger had suddenly opened the cab's door, which scraped the side of a tram. The taxi driver's insurer refused to pay out on the basis that the collision was the fault of the passenger. The tram company did not know who the passenger was, so it asked the Latvian police. The police disclosed the passenger's name but refused to disclose his identity card number or address because the national law did not include disclosure provisions for such data to third persons. The tram company challenged police refusal before the National Court, and the Court referred two questions to the CJEU. The main question referred to the CJEU was whether Article 7(f) of DPD imposes an obligation on a Data Controller to disclose all the personal data necessary to start court proceedings against a person. The National Supreme Court further questioned whether the answer to the latter would vary if that person were a minor or not. The CJEU laid down three cumulative conditions that make lawful the processing of personal data. When first applying the test, it was determined that the pursuit of a legitimate interest is not a question that should be answered only by the Data Controller. The same criterion should be answered by any party to whom the data are asked to be disclosed. Secondly, the CJEU continued with the need to process personal data for the purposes of legitimate interests; and ended with the balancing test that asserted that the fundamental rights and freedoms of the person concerned do not take precedence by the data protection. The judge in para 29 & 30 specified that (a) is a legitimate interest if the interest of an injured party, in obtaining the personal information of the person who caused the damage, is based on the intention to sue the latter person. It was also noticed that (b) the address and/or the identification number of that person appears strictly
Outcome
CJEU Case
A judgment or Advocate General opinion in a case before the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde in EU
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Judgment Date
4 May 2017
Authority
Court of Justice of the European Union
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde - European Union (2017). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: