Enforcing jurisdiction
Czechia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.
Privacy topics

František Ryneš – CJEU Judgment (Czech Republic, 2014)

CJEU Judgment
Court of Justice of the European Union11 December 2014Czech Republic
final
CJEU Judgment

CJEU precedent (Directive 95/46/EC, pre-GDPR)

This is a Court of Justice judgment predating the GDPR. It interprets Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive). It is not a cookie or ePrivacy case and is excluded from cookie statistics and the Risk Calculator.

František Ryneš installed a camera system at his home to protect his family from attacks. The court found that he recorded people in public spaces without their consent, which is against privacy laws. This case highlights the importance of respecting privacy even when trying to ensure safety.

What happened

František Ryneš recorded people in public spaces using a home camera system without their consent.

Who was affected

People passing by his home who were recorded by the camera system.

What the authority found

The Court ruled that Ryneš violated privacy laws by processing personal data without consent.

Why this matters

This case shows that even home security measures must comply with privacy laws. Individuals and businesses should ensure they have consent when recording in public areas.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Paragraph 3(3) of Czech Law No 101/2000 Sb. on the Protection of Personal Data
Paragraph 44(2) of Czech Law No 101/2000 Sb. on the Protection of Personal Data
Paragraph 5(2)(e) of Czech Law No 101/2000 Sb. on the Protection of Personal Data
Decision AuthorityCJEU
Reviewed AuthorityNSS (Czech Republic)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Mr. Rynes installed a camera system on his family home for the purpose of protection, health and life of his family. His family had, for several years been subjected to attacks by unknown people and it was difficult to identify them. The camera system recorded the entrance to his home, the public foot path, and the entrance to the house opposite his home. On the night of 6th to 7th October 2007, there was an attack on his home. The camera system made it possible to identify the two suspects involved. Mr. Rynes handed over to the police the recording to be relied on in the criminal proceedings. One of the suspects questioned the legality of the video recording and Mr Rynes was found to have infringed Law No. 101/2000 with respect to the protection of personal data. In particular, he was found to be a data controller who used the camera system to collect information without the consent of persons moving on the streets or opposite house. In addition, he had failed to inform them of the processing of personal data and lastly, as a Data Controller, he had not fulfilled the obligation to report the processing to the relevant office. Mr Rynes brought an action challenging this decision before the Prague City Court who dismissed the action. He appealed the decision to the Supreme Administrative Court who stayed the proceedings and referred the matter to the CJEU. The dispute in question is whether the operation of a home camera system which records people for purpose of protecting the property but monitors a public space amounts to processing of personal data as enumerated under Article 3(1) Directive 95/46. The court looked at the term personal data under Article 3(1) Directive 95/46 and Article 2(a) Directive 95/46 which is defined as any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person, an identified person being one who can be identified directly or indirectly in reference to one or more factors specific to his physical identity. Accordingly, the

Outcome

CJEU Case

A judgment or Advocate General opinion in a case before the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for František Ryneš in CZ

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Judgment Date

11 December 2014

Authority

Court of Justice of the European Union

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. František Ryneš - Czech Republic (2014). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: