Court case N. R.G. 54031/2025 – Court Ruling (Italy, 2026)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Italian court ruled that the national broadcaster Rai could air a private conversation involving a politician, which was part of an investigative report. This decision highlights the balance between privacy and the public's right to know. It shows that sometimes sharing personal information can be justified if it serves a significant public interest.
What happened
The court annulled a fine against Rai for broadcasting a private conversation without consent.
Who was affected
Gennaro Sangiuliano, a former Minister, and his wife were affected by the broadcast of their private conversation.
What the authority found
The court held that Rai's broadcast was a legitimate exercise of investigative journalism and did not violate data protection principles.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that media organizations can share personal data if it is essential for informing the public about important issues. It serves as a reminder for all organizations to consider the context when handling personal information.
National Law Articles
In December 2024, the investigative television programme Report, by the national broadcaster Rai, aired a segment addressing a political controversy involving then-Minister Gennaro Sangiuliano. The controversy involved the provisional appointment of the Minister’s affair partner for a role of public relevance, then withdrawn. The programme shared excerpts of a private telephone conversation between Sangiuliano and his wife requesting to withdraw the appointment, as well as references to other communications with ministry officials. The broadcast suggested that personal considerations had influenced the decision not to proceed with the appointment. Following the broadcast, Sangiuliano and his wife filed separate complaints against Rai. In October 2025 the DPA imposed an administrative fine of €150,000 and ordered Rai to cease further processing of the audio recording, including its storage in its archives. The DPA held that the dissemination of the private conversation exceeded what was necessary for journalistic purposes and violated data protection principles, in particular the requirement of essentiality of information. Rai challenged the decision, arguing that the broadcast pursued a legitimate public interest and complied with the journalistic exemption under data protection law. The court annulled the DPA’s decision, holding that the broadcast fell within the legitimate exercise of investigative journalism and respected the proper balance between privacy and freedom of information. From a privacy perspective, the court emphasised that data protection rules do not prohibit the dissemination of personal data as such, but require a contextual assessment of whether the disclosure is essential to inform the public about matters of genuine public interest. In this case, the court found that the private conversation was not used to berate the Minister’s personal life, but to demonstrate, through unmediated evidence, the concrete influence of private relationships i
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case N. R.G. 54031/2025 in IT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
22 January 2026
Authority
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-court-9817About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case N. R.G. 54031/2025 - Italy (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: