CJEU case C‑307/22 FT (Copies of medical records) – CJEU Judgment (Germany, 2023)

CJEU Judgment
Court of Justice of the European Union26 October 2023Germany
final
CJEU Judgment

CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action

This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Court of Justice ruled on a case about a patient wanting a free copy of their medical records. The court's decision will help clarify if patients can get their records without paying, which is important for their rights. This ruling could influence how healthcare providers handle similar requests in the future.

What happened

A patient requested a free copy of their medical records from their healthcare provider.

Who was affected

The patient, who suspected errors in their dental treatment, was affected by this case.

What the authority found

The Court held that the interpretation of GDPR provisions is necessary to determine if a free copy must be provided.

Why this matters

This ruling could set a precedent for how medical records are accessed in Europe. Healthcare providers should be aware of their obligations under GDPR when handling patient requests.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 12(5) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 15(3) GDPR
Art. 23(1)(i) GDPR
Decision AuthorityCJEU
Reviewed AuthorityBGH (Germany)
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The case involved a dispute between a patient (DW) and a healthcare practitioner (FT) regarding access to the patient's medical file. DW is the data subject and FT the controller. DW received dental care from the controller and suspected errors during the treatment. DW requested a free copy of their medical file from FT. FT insisted that DW should bear the costs associated with providing the copy, in accordance with German national law. Initially, DW's request for a free copy was granted, as the first-instance court based their interpretation of German national legislation in light of Article 12(5) and Article 15(1) and 15(3) GDPR. FT appealed this decision to the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice, Germany). The court stated that the solution to the dispute depends on the interpretation that should be given of the provisions of the GDPR. Therefore, the Bundesgerichtshof referred the case to the CJEU as a preliminary reference with the following questions: 1. Does the GDPR (Article 15(3) GDPR, read in conjunction with Article 12(5) GDPR) require the practitioner to provide a free copy of the patient's personal data when the patient's request is for a purpose other than those mentioned in the GDPR under recital 63? For example in this case, requesting a first copy of their medical file in order to hold a medical practitioner liable? 2. If the answer to the first question is negative: a) Can a national provision adopted before the GDPR came into force restrict the right to receive a free copy of personal data granted by the GDPR?In this case the rights granted by reading first sentence of Article 15(3), in conjunction with Article 12(5) of the GDPR under Article 23(1)(i) GDPR. b) If the answer to a) is positive, do the 'rights and freedoms of others mentioned under Article 23(1)(i) GDPR include being relieved of the costs and charges associated with providing a copy of the data? c) If the answer to b) is positive, does a national regulation that gives the d

Outcome

CJEU Judgment

A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for CJEU case C‑307/22 FT (Copies of medical records) in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Judgment Date

26 October 2023

Authority

Court of Justice of the European Union

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. CJEU case C‑307/22 FT (Copies of medical records) - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: