SOVIM SA – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2022)
CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action
This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Court of Justice of the European Union examined a case involving SOVIM SA, where the company sought to limit public access to its beneficial owner's details due to potential safety threats. The court's decision clarified the terms 'exceptional circumstances' and 'disproportionate risk' under EU anti-money laundering laws. This ruling is significant for businesses needing to protect sensitive ownership data while adhering to transparency requirements.
What happened
SOVIM SA asked to restrict public access to its beneficial owner's details, citing safety threats.
Who was affected
The beneficial owner of SOVIM SA, concerned about safety threats from public access to their information.
What the authority found
The Court of Justice clarified the interpretation of 'exceptional circumstances' and 'disproportionate risk' under EU anti-money laundering laws.
Why this matters
This ruling is crucial for businesses as it explains when they can limit public access to ownership information for safety reasons, balancing transparency and privacy.
GDPR Articles Cited
In Case C-37/20, YO, a real estate company, lodget a request to Luxembourg Business Registers (LBR) pursuant Article 15 Law of 13 January 2019 (Law of 13 January 2019 of Luxembourg establishing the Beneficial Owner Register - transposing the provisions of Article 30 Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing) requesting that access to the information concerning WM, its beneficial owner, contained in the register, to be restricted solely to the entities mentioned in that provision, on the ground that the general public’s access to that information would seriously, actually and immediately expose WM and his family to a disproportionate risk and risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, harassment, violence or intimidation. On November 20, 2019 the request was rejected by LBR arguing that WM’s situation does not meet the requirements of Article 15 Law of 13 January 2019, since WM cannot rely either on ‘exceptional circumstances’ or on any of the risks referred to in that article. On 5 December 2019, WM brought an action before the tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luxembourg District Court, Luxembourg), maintaining that his position as executive officer and beneficial owner of YO and of a number of commercial companies requires him frequently to travel to countries whose political regime is unstable and where there is a high level of crime, which creates a significant risk of his being kidnapped, abducted, subjected to violence or even killed. In that regard, the referring court raised the question of the interpretation to be given to the concepts of ‘exceptional circumstances’, ‘risk’ and ‘disproportionate’ risk within the meaning of Article 30(9) Directive 2015/849, as amended. In Case C‑601/20, Sovim lodged a request to LBR, pursuant to Article 15 Law of 13 January 2019, requesting that access to the information concerning its beneficial owner, contained in th
Outcome
CJEU Judgment
A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for SOVIM SA in EU
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Judgment Date
22 November 2022
Authority
Court of Justice of the European Union
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-cjeu-7767About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. SOVIM SA - European Union (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: