Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

the Mayor of Zwolle – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2026)

Court Ruling
DPA RbOverijssel13 February 2026Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that the Mayor of Zwolle could deny a person's request for access to personal data in a confidential report related to a liquor license application. This ruling underscores the balance between transparency and protecting sensitive information.

What happened

The Mayor rejected a request for access to personal data contained in a confidential report related to a liquor license application.

Who was affected

The individual who requested access to their personal data in the RIEC report.

What the authority found

The court upheld the Mayor's decision to deny access, stating it was necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of others under GDPR.

Why this matters

This ruling illustrates that authorities can refuse access to personal data when confidentiality is required, reinforcing the importance of protecting sensitive information in public administration.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 41 GDPR
Art. 15(4) GDPR
Art. 23(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(4) GDPR
Art. 23(1) GDPR
Art. 41(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 28 Bibob Act
Decision AuthorityRb. Overijssel

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A data subject requested access to personal data processed about him, contained in an advice report from t[https://www.riec.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2014/01/01/corporate-brochure-riec-liec-engels/Corporate+brochure+Engels.pdf he Regional Information and Expertise Center (RIEC)], related to his application for a liquor and hospitality license. The RIEC report was prepared as part of a Bibob investigation (a Dutch law for integrity assessments in public administration) into the legality of the business transfer and financial flows. The Mayor (the controller) rejected the request under Article 15(4) GDPR, Article 23(1)(i) GDPR, and Article 41 GDPR, claiming that restricting access was necessary and proportionate to protect the rights and freedoms of others, including the Mayor himself, and that the RIEC report fell under the confidentiality obligation in Article 28 of the [https://www.justis.nl/sites/default/files/2022-10/Factsheet%20The%20Dutch%20Bibob%20Act.pdf Bibob Act.] The data subject filed an objection to this refusal, which the Mayor declared unfounded and maintained the refusal. The data subject subsequently appealed the decision to the District Court Overijssel. The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the controller lawfully refused access to the personal data in the RIEC report. The court found that the report was part of a [https://www.justis.nl/sites/default/files/2022-10/Factsheet%20The%20Dutch%20Bibob%20Act.pdf Bibob] investigation and therefore subject to the confidentiality obligations under [https://www.justis.nl/sites/default/files/2022-10/Factsheet%20The%20Dutch%20Bibob%20Act.pdf Article 28 of the Bibob Act,] which preclude disclosure except in limited circumstances that did not apply here. Also, the court confirmed that restricting access was necessary and proportionate to protect the rights and freedoms of others, including the Mayor and the RIEC, as permitted under Article 15(4) GDPR, Article 23(1)(i) GDPR, a

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for the Mayor of Zwolle in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 February 2026

Authority

DPA RbOverijssel

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. the Mayor of Zwolle - Netherlands (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: