GDPR Fines & Penalties 2026
Search GDPR fines, penalties, warnings, orders, bans, and investigations across Europe by country, action type, GDPR article, and violation category.
Frequently Asked Questions About GDPR Enforcement
Q:What types of GDPR enforcement actions exist?
GDPR enforcement actions include monetary fines (the most publicised), formal warnings, reprimands, processing bans, data erasure orders, and compliance orders. DPAs can also impose temporary or permanent limitations on data processing. Fines can reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, under Article 83(5) GDPR.
Q:How are GDPR fines calculated by data protection authorities?
DPAs consider factors listed in Article 83(2) GDPR: nature, gravity, and duration of the infringement; intentional or negligent character; actions taken to mitigate damage; degree of responsibility; previous infringements; degree of cooperation; categories of personal data affected; how the infringement became known; and adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Q:Can GDPR fines be appealed?
Yes, GDPR fines can be appealed through national courts. Many high-profile fines have been challenged. The appeals process varies by country. Some fines have been reduced on appeal (e.g., British Airways' fine was reduced from GBP 183 million to GBP 20 million), while others have been upheld or even increased.
Browse case links on this page
GDPR Enforcement Actions (131 total)
- A data subject (an employee) (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Jan 2025
- An unnamed telecom provider (Belgium) – court ruling – Jan 2025
- Hospital (Belgium) – €200K – Dec 2024
- Freedelity (Belgium) – violation found – Nov 2024
- X versus Y (Belgium) – €5K – Nov 2024
- RTL Belgium SA (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Oct 2024 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button
- MediaHuis (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Sept 2024 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button, Reject Harder Than Accept
- Roularta Media Group N.V. (Belgium) – dismissed – Sept 2024
- Cumuleo.be (Belgium) – dismissed – Aug 2024
- Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Feb 2024
- Black Tiger Belgium (Belgium) – €175K – Jan 2024
- Les Editions de l'Avenir Presse (Belgium) – order – Dec 2023 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button
- Ms. X, represented by noyb - European Center for Digital Rights (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button, Reject Harder Than Accept
- Mediafin (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023 | Cannot Withdraw Cookie Consent, Misleading Banner Messaging, No Reject Button, Reject Harder Than Accept
- Madame X1 and Monsieur X2 (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Nov 2023
- City Of Kortrijk (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Aug 2023
- Court case 2023/AR/801 (Belgium) – court ruling – Jun 2023
- Belgian Order of Pharmacists (Belgium) – €30K – Jun 2023
- Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Sporen (NMBS) (Belgium) – court ruling – Jun 2023
- Commissariat Général aux Réfugiés et Apatrides (CGRA) (Belgium) – dismissed – Jun 2023
- SPF Finances (Belgium) – complaint upheld – May 2023
- Meta (Belgium) – dismissed – Mar 2023
- A care home (the controller) (Belgium) – complaint upheld – Mar 2023
- SA Rossel et Cie (Belgium) – court ruling – Feb 2023 | Cookies Placed Before Consent, No Reject Button, Reject Harder Than Accept, Third-Party Cookies Without Consent, Unclear Cookie Information
- Requests and Social Affairs Department of the King's Office (Belgium) – dismissed – Feb 2023