Enforcing jurisdiction
Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

OP-Henkivakuutus Oy – Court Ruling (Finland, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu16 January 2024Finland
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Administrative Court of Helsinki ruled that OP-Henkivakuutus Oy could not process health data of life insurance applicants without a valid legal basis. This decision highlights the importance of having clear legal grounds for handling sensitive information. It impacts how insurance companies evaluate risks for applicants.

What happened

The court ruled that OP-Henkivakuutus had no legal basis to process health data of life insurance applicants.

Who was affected

Life insurance applicants whose health data was processed by OP-Henkivakuutus without proper justification.

What the authority found

The court determined that the Finnish Data Protection Act does not permit insurance companies to treat applicants as insured parties before a contract is finalized.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the necessity for insurance companies to have a valid legal basis for processing sensitive data. It serves as a caution for all businesses to review their data handling practices.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 9(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 2(1)(5) Insurance Contracts Act
§ 6(1)(1) Data Protection Act
Decision AuthorityHelsingin hallinto-oikeus
Reviewed AuthorityTietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland)

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller (OP-Henkivakuutus Oy, a life insurance company) had asked the Administrative Court of Helsinki (the Court) to overturn the Finnish DPA's decision, according to which the controller had no legal basis to process the health data of life insurance applicants. The controller filed the appeal claiming that it must be able to process the health data because the health status of the insured party and the risks associated with it are at the centre of the risk assessment related to the granting of the insurance. The controller also considered that insurance applicants must also be considered insured parties in accordance with [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2018/20181050#L2P6 Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection Act], according to which insurance institutions may, despite the general prohibition in Article 9(1) GDPR, process the health data of the insured party and the claimant, which is necessary to assess the risks of the insurance institution. The Court noted that neither the Finnish Data Protection Act nor its preparatory material have defined what is meant by the insured party in connection with the application of the Act. However, in the Court's view, the preparatory material of the Finnish Data Protection Act does not support as an interpretation that the legislator intended to extend the concept of "insured party" to apply also to the applicant of an insurance before the conclusion of an insurance contract. In this respect, the Court also stated that the "insured party" is defined in [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1994/19940543#L1P2 Section 2(1)(5) of the Finnish Insurance Contracts Act], according to which the insured refers to the party that is currently subject to personal insurance or non-life insurance policy. Thus, the Court considered that this definition could be used as a starting point for interpretation also when applying [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2018/20181050#L2P6 Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Da

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

16 January 2024

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. OP-Henkivakuutus Oy - Finland (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: